The California senate will vote on Thursday on a bill to extend a
moratorium indefinitely on the sale of kangaroo products like
premier league baseball mitts and fire retardant gloves favored by
U.S. firefighters.
Powerful animal rights and democracy lobbyists in California are
angry about the way the bill was introduced this week via the
backdoor, just days before the end of the current legislative
session, following extensive Australian government lobbying and
financial aid.
The A$200 million ($140 million) trade of kangaroo skin and meat is
an emotive issue. The Australian native graces the country's coat of
arms and is a major tourism draw, making it a high profile target
for animal rights activists who oppose commercial killing.
However, with a kangaroo population of about 48 million, more than
double the human population, the animal is also considered a pest in
many areas because of the threat it poses to agriculture, cattle and
endangered animals.
California - the world's largest market for upmarket leather goods -
formally banned the import and sale of kangaroo products in 1971,
but the market has flourished under an eight-year moratorium.
Skins are popular with sportswear manufacturers including Adidas AG
and Nike Inc. The moratorium is due to expire at the end of this
year.
Democrat lawmaker Mike Gipson this week used a tactic known as a
"gut and amend" to switch a bill on gambling that had already
reached the senate floor to one that proposes the extension of the
moratorium, this time with no sunset clause.
The bill must be approved by two-thirds of the senate in a vote
scheduled for Thursday before going to committee.
'SECRECY'
The maneuver is legal but frowned upon by many democracy advocates
as it does not allow for open and extensive debate on an issue.
"It smacks of special interest dealing and secrecy," said U.S.
Humane Society spokeswoman Jennifer Fearing from the California
Capitol building, where she was pressing lawmakers to vote against
the bill.
[to top of second column] |
"If they are so confident that kangaroos are abundant and there's no
problem and California should continue to sell products, why so much
secrecy?"
Another lobbyist, Lauren Ornelas of the Food Empowerment Project,
has filed a complaint to the Fair Political Practices Commission,
alleging Australia may have acted illegally because it did not
declare financial payments or register as a lobbyist employer.
Australia's Department of Agriculture confirmed it provided
A$143,000 to the Kangaroo Industries Association of Australia to
help pay U.S. law firm Manatt, Phelps and Phillips to lobby
Californian lawmakers against the ban.
A spokesman for Agriculture Minister Barnaby Joyce declined to
comment further, but stressed that commercial harvests of kangaroos,
generally about 15-20 percent of the population, were both
sustainable and humane.
A group of 74 Australian scientists and activists has issued an open
letter questioning the data.
The industry is cautiously hopeful the Californian lobbying will pay
off.
Adidas and Nike did not respond to requests for comment.
(Reporting By Jane Wardell; Editing by Robert Birsel)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|