Pacira
sues FDA over pain drug marketing restrictions
Send a link to a friend
[September 09, 2015] By
Brendan Pierson
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Pacira Pharmaceuticals
Inc on Tuesday filed a lawsuit seeking a court order allowing it to
promote its post-surgery pain drug, Exparel, for a wide range of
surgeries, which the U.S. Food and Drug Administration opposes.
|
The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Manhattan, cites another New
York judge's recent decision allowing Irish drugmaker Amarin Plc to
market its fish oil drug Vascepa for unapproved, or off-label, uses,
though Pacira contends that its own marketing is not for off-label
use.
Exparel, launched in 2012, is approved for administration into the
site of surgery to produce post-surgery pain relief. Its approval
was based on studies of its use in bunionectomies and
hemorrhoidectomies, and the drug's label gives specific doses only
for those operations.
Pacira, however, has promoted it for use in all kinds of surgeries.
The drug generated 95 percent of Pacira's nearly $197.6 million in
revenue last year.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a12fd/a12fd7c220a6c4a8898a1cf4e4c33881599de8f1" alt=""
In September 2014, according to the lawsuit, the FDA sent Pacira a
warning letter telling it to stop promoting Exparel for use in any
surgeries other than bunionectomies or hemorrhiodectomies.
The Parsippany, New Jersey-based company alleges that all of its
marketing is on-label, and that the FDA is illegally trying to
narrow the indication of the drug it has already approved after the
fact.
More broadly, however, Pacira claims that even if it were trying to
promote the drug off-label, it would have the right to do so as long
as it did so truthfully.
In its support, Pacira pointed to U.S. District Judge Paul
Engelmayer's decision last month in the Amarin case. Engelmayer
ruled that drug companies' truthful speech to doctors is protected
by the First Amendment, even if it is intended to promote off-label
use.
[to top of second column] |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57ab5/57ab5b76ebb9a1569951282c1cd4a6b912f4d853" alt=""
The Amarin case was closely watched by the pharmaceutical industry
because it was one of the first to raise a First Amendment argument
in defense of off-label drug promotion.
An FDA spokeswoman could not immediately be reached for comment.
Exparel combines a local anesthetic, bupivacaine, with the company's
DepoFoam technology, a drug delivery system that releases the
medicine over a period of time.
The case is Pacira Pharmaceuticals inc et al v. U.S. Food & Drug
Administration et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New
York, No. 1:15-cv-07055.
(The story was refiled to correct the fourth paragraph to cite
Pacira not Exparel)
(Editing by Jonathan Oatis)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4d2f/b4d2f0b85046612478130b485411e3517057bcbf" alt="" |