Congressional
bill aims to get NFL to change the name 'Redskins'
Send a link to a friend
[September 11, 2015]
By Steve Ginsburg
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The District of
Columbia's non-voting congressional delegate introduced a bill on
Thursday to strip the NFL of its federal antitrust protection as long as
it allows Washington's football team to use the name "Redskins," a
moniker some see as racist.
|
Democrat Eleanor Holmes Norton said the National Football League
and Washington's football team "should not be benefiting financially
from federal antitrust exemptions while they continue to promote a
disparaging moniker that has been found by legal authorities to be a
racial slur."
A federal judge in July upheld a decision by the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office that the name was "disparaging to Native Americans"
and thus ineligible for federal trademark registration.
Norton said in a statement: "The name of the nation’s capital,
Washington, should always be associated with pride, not with a
moniker that mocks and insults Native Americans."
Calling the name an "embarrassment to the league and to the
country," Norton said NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and the
league’s team owners needed to "get on the right side of the law and
of history and change the name."
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2015/Sep/11/images/ads/current/dare-sda-balloon-2015.png) The owner of the Redskins, Daniel Snyder, has said the name shows
respect to Native Americans and that he will not change it under any
circumstances.
"We disagree with Ms. Norton’s opposition to the Washington Redskins
name," a Redskins spokesman told Reuters via e-mail. "More than 85
percent of Ms. Norton's constituents disagree as well, as recent
polls have shown."
[to top of second column] |
![](../images/ads/current/richardson_lda_040113.png)
The NFL did not respond to a request for comment on the bill, which
faces an uphill climb in the Republican-controlled House of
Representatives.
Congress granted the NFL and the other major pro sports leagues
antitrust exemptions in 1961, allowing teams to work together in
negotiating contracts.
Last year, Norton tried to force a name change through a bill that
would have denied tax-exempt status to any pro sports league that
allowed a member to benefit from the name Redskins.
But the NFL in April gave up that tax-exempt status on its own.
Norton can propose legislation in the House but has no vote because
she represents the District of Columbia.
(Reporting by Steve Ginsburg; Editing by Andrew Hay and Peter
Cooney)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2015/Sep/11/images/ads/current/business_directory_filler.png) |