Responding (here and here, for example) to Watchdog investigations into pay
inequality between union leaders and rank-and-file members, union supporters
insist workers shouldn’t care that union bosses are paid six figures — because
executives at huge corporations are paid more.
Concerns about chief executive officer pay are stoked by union coalition
AFL-CIO, whose annual Executive Paywatch report decries the “grotesque
inequality” between low-skill workers and heads of businesses in the S&P 500
index.
Executive Paywatch is promoted heavily by AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka and
frequently cited by opponents of right-to-work, who see CEO pay as an argument
for forcing workers to pay unions whether they want to or not.
The average corporate CEO was paid $216,100 last year, based on data from the
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Trumka, who was paid $322,131, was not even one
of the nation’s 100 highest-paid union bosses.
RELATED: America’s top labor union bosses raked in millions in 2014
To be sure, executives at many of America’s largest companies are paid more than
the union officers and employees who run the labor unions in Missouri and other
states.
But does it make sense to compare union bosses — whose pay is taken from the
workers they claim to represent — to the CEOs who pay workers’ salaries?
Tim Jones, chairman of the Missouri Club for Growth and former speaker of the
Missouri House of Representatives, told Watchdog it’s an “apples and oranges”
comparison meant to distract from “massive” union boss salaries.
“Most people would be amazed at how much labor bosses actually do make,” Jones
said. “People need to know there are labor bosses that are multimillionaires.”
Unlike CEOs who “believe people should be paid for the actual value of the labor
they provide” and whose businesses create the profits that keep workers
employed, Jones said, union leaders espouse a “flattening of everyone’s wages”
that clashes with their own plump paychecks.
He called it hypocritical for union bosses to make a living selling “solidarity”
to workers who are forced to pay them.
[to top of second column] |
“How much solidarity is there when the labor bosses are taking
home six-figure paychecks?” Jones asked.
Jones, who sponsored a right-to-work bill in the past legislative
session, expects the Missouri General Assembly to hold an override
vote Wednesday on Gov. Jay Nixon’s veto of the right-to-work bill
passed this spring.
Whatever the outcome, Jones said Missouri Club for Growth will
continue supporting lawmakers who vote to let workers choose whether
to pay union dues.
As Watchdog reported last week, two of the union officials leading
the “Preserve Middle Class Missouri” push against right-to-work are
paid $177,000 each, more than triple the average Missouri household
income.
Staff of the Carpenters union behind “The Committee to Protect MO
Families” are paid an average of $94,834, while Missouri carpenters
are paid an average of $50,120.
The gulf between Missouri workers and the union bosses paid with
workers’ dues widens when union leaders are compared to
inexperienced workers the same way AFL-CIO compares S&P 500 CEOs to
entry-level workers.
Missourians who graduated from state colleges with associate degrees
in 2012 were paid an average of $42,477 in heavily unionized
construction trades last year, according to Missouri Department of
Economic Development records.
Workers with annual wages at the tenth percentile in several major
sectors of Missouri’s economy were paid roughly one-tenth as much as
the union bosses running Preserve Middle Class Missouri.
Based on federal data, wages at the tenth percentile for sales and
related jobs were $16,770 in Missouri last year. Transportation and
material moving jobs paid $17,600 at the tenth percentile, while
office and administrative support jobs paid $18,940 and production
jobs paid $19,000.
Union bosses typically refuse to comment on their own pay,
especially in the midst of campaigns like their fight to sustain
Nixon’s right-to-work veto in Missouri. Multiple Teamsters union
locals, United Food & Commercial Workers Local 655 and the Missouri
AFL-CIO failed to respond to questions from Watchdog.
Click here to respond to the editor about this article
|