| 
            
			
			 If Washington sticks to its schedule for withdrawing troops, by 
			the time his tour ends in November, the NATO training mission in 
			Afghanistan will be nearing its end, despite local forces struggling 
			to fight the Taliban insurgency alone. 
			 
			"There is still much work to do," said Chung, a veteran of several 
			Afghan tours, speaking at Sorab base, a dusty expanse of blast walls 
			and wire fences in Helmand. 
			 
			"You have to adjust your expectations," he told Reuters during a 
			recent visit to the base in the southern province, where Taliban 
			militants, bent on overthrowing the government and driving out 
			foreign forces, made major gains in recent months. 
			 
			Corruption and issues like irregular leave due to heavy fighting and 
			pay have undermined efficiency and hurt morale among local troops. 
			 
			He has seen progress since arriving in February but remains 
			realistic: "We understand we're not going to be able to fix all 
			that." 
			
			  As things stand, U.S. forces in Afghanistan are due to be nearly 
			halved to 5,500 from the current level of 9,800 by the start of 
			2017. At that level, U.S. officials say the training mission would 
			not be able to continue. 
			 
			But the timetable is coming under scrutiny, as the new U.S. 
			commander of NATO forces in Afghanistan conducts a review of 
			security before making recommendations to Washington some time in 
			June. 
			 
			General John Nicholson recently told Reuters that heavy fighting and 
			casualties in 2015 had meant the training mission was behind 
			schedule. 
			 
			NATO commanders say big strides have been made by fledgling Afghan 
			security forces, built virtually from scratch since the Taliban was 
			toppled from power in 2001. 
			 
			But the sharp escalation in casualties and territorial losses in 
			2015, the first year Afghan forces fought without combat support 
			from NATO, has underlined the risks involved in having only 5,500 
			U.S. soldiers in the country. 
			 
			Afghan officials say forces lack vital resources including close air 
			support, which the small local air force cannot yet provide at 
			anything like the levels NATO could, as well as expertise in areas 
			like maintenance and logistics. 
			 
			"Those capabilities are still under development and there is a lot 
			more work needed," Acting Defence Minister Masoom Stanekzai said on 
			a recent visit to the Afghan 215th Corps headquarters at Sorab. "We 
			need international assistance." 
			 
			FROM DEFENSE TO OFFENsE 
			 
			One of the biggest challenges Chung said he faced was trying to 
			change the mindset of Afghan soldiers, as NATO pushes them to be 
			more offensive in operations against the Taliban. 
			 
			"They'd go out to a certain area, and the first thing they'd do is 
			... build a checkpoint. From that point on, they'd become very 
			stationary," he said, describing how local forces tended to operate. 
			 
			Chung and his team are among around 500 U.S. troops dispatched to 
			bolster 215th Corps, a reflection of international alarm at how 
			Helmand security had deteriorated early in 2016. 
			 
			The training, mainly by Afghan officers backed up by U.S. mentors, 
			covers everything from battle tactics to driving, vehicle 
			maintenance, equipment care and bomb disposal. 
			 
			
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
            
			  
			"At some point, there's going to be an end-date on this," Chung 
			said. "We're here to help them build something that they can sustain 
			and manage." 
			 
			But U.S. officials acknowledge that the task has been complicated by 
			problems including corruption among some officers that undermined 
			confidence and morale. 
			 
			"If you don't know someone higher up in the army, all your benefits 
			go to soldiers who know army officials," said Darweza Khan, a 215th 
			Corps soldier serving in Gereshk district. 
			 
			A spokesman for the "Resolute Support" training mission said earlier 
			this year that several senior officers in the 215th Corps had been 
			replaced for graft that led to soldiers not being adequately looked 
			after and supplies and equipment being stolen. 
			 
			"MORE TIME WOULD BE GREAT" 
			 
			Nicholson has declined to comment on troop levels as he prepares his 
			review, but U.S. military spokesman Brigadier General Charles 
			Cleveland said asking for more flexibility, including in use of air 
			power, was among options he was considering. 
			 
			That would be welcome by the government, which has struggled to 
			contain the insurgency since NATO formally ended combat operations 
			at the end of 2014, leaving only a fraction of an international 
			force that peaked at more than 130,000. 
			 
			Whether there is appetite for more delays in reducing U.S. forces 
			remains to be seen, particularly in election year. 
			 
			If the current plan remains, U.S. focus will switch to 
			counterterrorism operations against Islamic State, al Qaeda and 
			other groups, with little capacity for training and advising. 
			
			
			  
			
			Foreign officers involved in the program remain realistic, given 
			that time is running short. 
			 
			"This is not an overnight fix," said British Major General Paul 
			Nanson, commandant of the Royal Military Academy, Sandhurst, which 
			has worked closely with the Afghan army's officer training school 
			near Kabul on building a new generation of army leaders. 
			 
			"This is a generational change. We've now committed to seeing it 
			through 2016 which is good news. If we haven't got more time, we've 
			got to do the best we can with the time available." 
			 
			(Additional reporting by Mohammad Stanekzai in Lashkar Gah; Editing 
			by Mike Collett-White) 
			
			[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] 
			Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  |