| 
			
			 The settlement, which Goldman disclosed in January, stems from the 
			firm's conduct in packaging, securitization, marketing and sale of 
			residential mortgage-backed securities between 2005 and 2007, the 
			Justice Department said. 
 Investors suffered billions of dollars in losses from the securities 
			bought during the period, the department said.
 
 The settlement comprises a $2.385 billion civil penalty and $1.8 
			billion in other relief, including funds for homeowners whose 
			mortgages exceed the value of their property, as well as distressed 
			borrowers. It also preserves the government's ability to bring 
			criminal charges against Goldman and does not release any 
			individuals from potential criminal or civil liability, the Justice 
			Department said.
 
 In addition, Goldman will pay $875 million to resolve claims by the 
			New York and Illinois attorneys general, the National Credit Union 
			Administration and the Federal Home Loan Banks of Chicago and 
			Seattle.
 
			
			 
			A state and federal working group formed to investigate wrongdoing 
			in the pre-financial crisis mortgage-backed securities market 
			negotiated the settlement, said New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman.
 The group has reached settlements with five other major financial 
			institutions since 2012: J.P. Morgan Chase  ($13 billion), Bank 
			of America  ($16.6 billion), Citibank  ($7 billion) and 
			Morgan Stanley  ($3.2 billion).
 
 "We are pleased to put these legacy matters behind us," a Goldman 
			spokesman said in a statement. "Since the financial crisis, we have 
			taken significant steps to strengthen our culture, reinforce our 
			commitment to our clients, and ensure our governance processes are 
			robust," he said.
 
 Goldman also acknowledged a Justice Department statement of facts 
			describing how the firm misled investors.
 
			
            [to top of second column] | 
            
			 
			For example, Goldman's due diligence for one issue of 2006 
			mortgage-backed securities showed that some of the loan pools 
			reflected an “unusually high” percentage of loans with credit and 
			compliance programs, the Department said.
 "How do we know that we caught everything?" asked a Goldman 
			committee tasked with reviewing and approving mortgage-backed 
			securities, according to the Justice Department. "We don't," a 
			Goldman manager said.
 
 "Depends on what you mean by everything? Because of the limited 
			sampling... we don’t catch everything,” another Goldman manager 
			said.
 
 Still, the committee approved the securities without requiring 
			additional due diligence, said the Justice Department, which did not 
			identify those involved.
 
 (This version of the story corrects period of misconduct to 
			2005-2007, not 2007-2009, in second paragraph)
 
 (Reporting by Suzanne Barlyn; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama and Dan 
			Grebler)
 
			[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			
			 |