| 
			
			 Unmarried men were 27 percent more likely to die of their tumors, 
			and single women were 19 percent more likely, the study found. 
 Married people generally had better health insurance and lived in 
			better neighborhoods, but single patients still fared worse even 
			after accounting for these financial reasons for the marriage 
			advantage.
 
 “It seems that the major contributing factor is greater social 
			support, and less social isolation, among married patients,” said 
			study leader Scarlett Lin Gomez of the University of California, San 
			Diego.
 
 “Having a strong support system can have meaningful impacts on the 
			odds of survival after a cancer diagnosis,” Lin added by email.
 
 The research team studied nearly 783,000 patients diagnosed with 
			cancer in California from 2000 through 2009, including about 387,000 
			who had died by 2012.
 
 They focused on patients with invasive malignancies and their 10 
			most common causes of cancer deaths.
 
			
			 
			  
			Once researchers adjusted for insurance status and neighborhood 
			socioeconomic status, unmarried men were 22 percent more likely to 
			die than their peers who had tied the knot, and single women were 15 
			percent more likely to die.
 At the start of the study, 70 percent of the men and 51 percent of 
			the women were married, and nearly all patients had some type of 
			health insurance.
 
 Unmarried patients were more likely to be black, live in low-income 
			neighborhoods, be uninsured or have government insurance, be 
			diagnosed at a later stage of disease, and not receive any surgery 
			or radiation.
 
 Uninsured men and women had about 25 percent higher odds of death 
			than people with private health insurance.
 
 The findings don’t prove single life causes death from cancer, 
			however. It’s also possible that certain characteristics that lead 
			people to marry, such as being physically or emotionally healthier 
			than people who don’t find mates, might influence patients’ survival 
			odds, the authors note in the journal Cancer.
 
 The results also don’t make cancer death a foregone conclusion for 
			single people, study coauthor Maria Elena Martinez of the University 
			of California, San Diego added by email.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
 
			“Single patients should take advantage of their support networks, 
			even if they do not necessarily have spouses or children to turn to 
			during a cancer diagnosis,” Martinez said. “This is particularly 
			important for male patients.”
 That’s because research suggests that men benefit more socially from 
			marriage, said Catherine Powers-James, a psychology researcher at 
			the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
 
			“Although both men and women may think they are being a burden on 
			others when they ask for help, women are more inclined to reach out 
			to others for emotional support and for assistance,” Powers-James, 
			who wasn’t involved in the study, said by email.
 Single patients who don’t have close friends might consider seeking 
			professional help from a therapist, Powers-James added.
 
 Not all marriages are the same, or equally strong in times of 
			crisis. But the findings suggest it’s worth investigating what 
			aspects of these long-term relationships may be most responsible for 
			better survival odds, since money clearly isn’t the only thing in 
			play.
 
 “To the extent that the U.S. will be seeing a greater number of 
			cancer patients and survivors due to the aging of our population, 
			coupled with a rising proportion of unmarried individuals, we can 
			look further into the possible ways that being married translates 
			into improved cancer survival so that we can use the information to 
			help all patients,” Martinez said.
 
 SOURCE: http://bit.ly/1TN8eso Cancer, published online April 11, 
			2016.
 
			[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			
			 |