Dealmakers
say a Trump presidency would be bad for M&A
Send a link to a friend
[April 14, 2016]
By Mike Stone
(Reuters) - A Donald Trump presidency
would be bad for corporate dealmaking, according to a global survey of
people who advise companies on mergers and acquisitions, or M&A.
|
Nearly two-thirds of 1,500 respondents - including investment
bankers, lawyers and people who work for private equity firms - said
a Trump presidency would create uncertainty that would deter
executives from launching bids.
The survey was conducted in April by Intralinks Holdings Inc <IL.N>,
which provides confidential meeting rooms used by companies when
they allow would-be bidders to look through their accounts.
"The real story is that dealmakers crave less disruption, and Trump
has been a polarizing figure on a global scale," Matt Porzio, vice
president of strategy at Intralinks, said in a phone interview on
Wednesday.
Trump is the front-runner for the Republican nomination for the Nov.
8 election. His unpredictable style and fiery rhetoric have some
investors worried that as president he could trigger trade wars,
hurt the economy and add a lot of volatility to financial markets.
The New York real estate developer prides himself on his ability to
make good deals, and M&A professionals in the United States were
less concerned about his impact on business than their peers
elsewhere.
According to the survey, 46 percent of U.S. dealmakers said they
believed Trump would have a negative impact on M&A activity,
compared with 83 percent of dealmakers in Latin America. Trump has
sparked controversy with his call for building a wall along the
Mexican border and for deporting 11 million illegal immigrants from
the United States.
[to top of second column] |
Some 71 percent of dealmakers based in Europe and 75 percent in Asia
thought Trump would be bad for business.
Globally, only 45 percent of respondents thought that U.S. Senator
Bernie Sanders of Vermont, a self-described socialist who is
competing with Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination, would
be bad for M&A activity.
But the same proportion - 45 percent - thought Clinton would have a
positive impact on mergers and acquisitions, making her the
candidate viewed to have the highest positive impact on corporate
tie-ups.
(Reporting by Mike Stone; Editing by Carmel Crimmins and Jonathan
Oatis)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|