| 
			
			 Google generated an estimated $11 billion (9.73 billion euros) last 
			year from sales of ads running on Android phones featuring Google 
			apps. Android has become the dominant software in recent years, 
			running most of the world's smartphones. 
 If the EU were to find Google guilty of market abuse it could lead 
			to a fine of up to $7.4 billion or 10 percent of 2015 revenue, while 
			forcing it to change its business practices.
 
 EU antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager said on Monday her agency's 
			probe centers on the use of exclusive contracts which enable phone 
			firms to run Google's own apps and not necessarily on demands they 
			bundle in a complete set of Google apps such as Search, Maps and 
			Gmail and its Google Play app store on phones.
 
 For while Android is open source software that gives device makers 
			the freedom to build and run their own software, the vast majority 
			of European phones run a standard package of software and Google 
			apps that must be licensed from Google, according to data from 
			Strategy Analytics, a technology market research firm.
 
			 
			"Our concern is that by requiring phone makers and operators to 
			pre-load a set of Google apps, rather than letting them decide for 
			themselves which apps to load, Google might have cut off one of the 
			main ways that new apps can reach customers," Vestager said at a 
			regulatory conference in Amsterdam.
 "We are looking into the question of tying, but tying in itself is 
			not necessarily a problem," she added in response to a question 
			about whether the EU had narrowed its list of concerns over Android.
 
 "It depends on how it's made but that is part of our investigation, 
			which as I said, is not done yet," she said, giving no further hints 
			on the timing of when her agency might expand its charge sheet 
			against Alphabet Inc’s Google.
 
 A year ago the EU charged Google with favoring its own shopping 
			service in Internet searches, adding at that time it was also 
			investigating whether the advertising giant was abusing its control 
			over Android. A decision on the shopping service case could come 
			later in 2016. Since February the EU watchdog has been asking 
			complainants concerning Android to remove sensitive details from 
			information provided to the Commission before it provides the data 
			to Google for its defense, four people familiar with the matter 
			said.
 
 However, some companies contacted by EU regulators last week were 
			given a 24-hour deadline to do so, the first time regulators have 
			set such a tight deadline, suggesting a charge sheet may be sent 
			within days, three of those sources said.
 
 The EU competition office in Brussels declined to comment on whether 
			new charges involving Android were in the works.
 
 A Google spokesman denied that it forces phone vendors into 
			exclusive contracts and said talks with the EU were continuing.
 
 "Anyone can use Android with or without Google applications. 
			Hardware manufacturers and carriers can decide how to use Android 
			and consumers have the last word about which apps they want to use," 
			Google spokesman Mark Jansen said in a statement.
 
			
            [to top of second column] | 
            
			
 
			GOOGLE'S DE FACTO CONTROL
 Google requires phone vendors to sign confidential contracts. A 
			handful of those contracts which have leaked into the public realm 
			do not explicitly force phone makers to pre-load certain Google 
			apps, but they do, effectively, require it in order for phone makers 
			to install the Google Play app store.
 
			Two thirds of all mobile phones used in Europe this month were 
			running on Android, according to StatCounter data. Devices running 
			on Apple's proprietary iOS software account for another 27 percent, 
			leaving other systems such as Microsoft  or Blackberry barely 
			registering in the rankings.
 EU regulators have received formal complaints from four Google 
			rivals that it used its control over Android to stifle competition 
			from alternative mobile phone operating systems, device makers, 
			network operators and rival app developers.
 
 Lawyers for several of the complainants as well as antitrust experts 
			not directly involved in the case, said charges against Android may 
			be easier for EU to prove because it is based on a set of contracts 
			that make it easier to show illegal behavior and to propose remedies 
			that free up competitors.
 
			"This conduct fits fairly nicely into existing legal theories which 
			are well established under existing EU competition law," said Thomas 
			Vinje, a partner at law firm Clifford Chance and counsel for 
			Brussels lobbying group FairSearch.
 FairSearch, which is backed by Google rivals including Microsoft , 
			Nokia and Oracle, lodged the first official EU complaint against 
			Android in 2013.
 
 
			
			 
			Since then FairSearch has been joined in filing separate complaints 
			by U.S.-based ad-blocking and privacy firm Disconnect Inc, 
			Portugal-based Aptoide, which runs a store for downloading Android 
			mobile apps that rivals Google Play Store, and Yandex , Russia's 
			biggest search engine.
 
 (1 euro = $1.1306)
 
 (This story adds sources saying that the EU is preparing to charge 
			Google over Android)
 
 (Editing by Greg Mahlich)
 
			[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |