| 
			
			 According to an order from the court posted Tuesday on a website 
			operated by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the 
			court issued the order on Dec. 31. 
 The order, signed by FISC Chief Judge Thomas Hogan, said the court 
			concluded that a surveillance application, apparently submitted by 
			the NSA, met the requirements of the USA Freedom Act, which 
			President Barack Obama signed last year.
 
 That law replaced an older one that allowed NSA to collect telephone 
			"metadata" - records of American citizens' and residents' calls, 
			including their origin and destination, when a call was placed and 
			how long it lasted. However, U.S. intelligence officials have said 
			the NSA did not collect the content of phone calls under this 
			program and did not look at the data without some specific 
			justification.
 
			
			 Former NSA contractor Edward Snowden revealed classified details of 
			the collection program in 2013, and last year, Congress and the 
			Obama administration narrowed the government's power to collect such 
			domestic telephone metadata.
 Under the new law and revised procedures, the government no longer 
			collects bulk telephone metadata, but must request targeted 
			information from telecoms companies after obtaining authorization 
			from the foreign intelligence court.
 
 The identities of the telecoms "providers" and the individuals or 
			numbers whose metadata the NSA has targeted were redacted from the 
			version of the court order released on Tuesday.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
			Hogan says in the opinion that the government was seeking "the 
			ongoing daily production of detailed call records relating to an 
			authorized international terrorism investigation", but does not 
			offer further detail about the nature of the investigation.
 In his order, the judge accepts the argument that while the 
			government was obliged to explain why targeting the telephone 
			numbers of individuals is "relevant" to its investigation, it does 
			not need to demonstrate the same relevance when examining numbers 
			called from the initially targeted phones.
 
 The judge also said that although the new surveillance law requires 
			government agencies to promptly destroy telephone metadata that it 
			might have mistakenly collected on U.S. persons, they sometimes can 
			retain such data for as long as six months if they have reason to 
			believe it could provide evidence of a crime.
 
 (Reporting By Mark Hosenball; Editing by John Walcott and David 
			Gregorio)
 
			[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			
			 |