|
 “It is very important for physicians to refer men and women to
cardiac rehab,” senior author Dr. Sherry L. Grace from York
University in Toronto told Reuters Health. “It is the first,
necessary step for patients to gain access to this
mortality-reducing model of care,” she said by email.
Participation in cardiac rehabilitation is associated with improved
survival, functional status and psychological wellbeing, as well as
lowered risk of recurrent cardiac events.
But previous studies have shown that women are significantly less
likely than men to take advantage of cardiac rehabilitation, the
study team writes in the Canadian Journal of Cardiology.
They analyzed data from 14 published studies to see how many people
participated in prescribed cardiac rehabilitation and how many stuck
with it through the end. The combined studies included a total of
8,176 men and women.
Cardiac rehabilitation programs in these studies ranged in duration
from 8 weeks to 32 weeks. Overall, patients went to 66.5 percent of
prescribed sessions.
Looking at men and women separately, however, the researchers found
that men went to nearly 69 percent of sessions while women went to
just 64 percent, on average.
The gender gap was especially apparent for programs of 12 weeks
duration or more, after which women’s participation dropped off. The
divergence between men and women also seemed to appear only in
studies after 2009, the study authors note, although they can't say
why.
“Overall, patients adhered to two-thirds of prescribed sessions,"
Grace said. “People often contend that cardiac rehabilitation should
not be funded because patients only attend half of sessions. Clearly
this is not the case. They certainly adhere quite well.”
As for reducing the disparity between men and women, Grace suggested
that "offering women-only classes, tailored to women’s needs and
preferences, may help; however, there is mixed evidence.”
"It is well known that women are referred less, and therefore enroll
less, in cardiac rehabilitation, but it was surprising to see that
even if they enroll their adherence is less than that of men,” said
Dr. Karin H. Humphries from University of British Columbia in
Vancouver, who co-authored a related editorial.
[to top of second column] |
“A roughly 4 percent difference in adherence may seem trivial, but
cardiac rehabilitation programs are designed to optimize outcomes so
an adherence rate of only 64 percent is worrisome,” Humphries told
Reuters Health by email.
“While not directly addressed by this paper, encouraging women to
participate in cardiac rehabilitation is still important," she said.
“And emphasizing the importance of adherence is also important. So
discussions about finding child support, if relevant, or
transportation solutions to help them attend, could help.”
Dr. Diann Gaalema from the University of Vermont's Center on
Behavior and Health in Burlington recently found in a separate study
that financial incentives could help increase cardiac rehabilitation
participation and adherence among Medicaid patients.
"Something in the system is not optimized for female patients.
Cardiac rehabilitation did start as a male-only model decades ago,
and it's possible that the system has not evolved along with the
changes in referral practices,” she said in an email.
“Really there are many reasons people drop out of cardiac
rehabilitation,” Gaalema said, including time, transportation and
other medical conditions, both physical and psychological, “and your
best bet may be to carefully screen people coming in to see what
their particular challenges are and try to adjust accordingly."
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/1UhrcYx and http://bit.ly/1Uhrhvk Canadian
Journal of Cardiology, online April 27, 2016.
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 |
