The findings suggest that when it comes to protein, where it comes
from may be just as important as how much people eat, said lead
study author Dr. Mingyang Song, a researcher at Harvard University
and Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.
“Plants are a better source than animal products,” Song said by
email.
“If people do have to choose among animal products, try to avoid
processed red meat and choose fish or chicken instead,” Song added.
Song and colleagues followed more than 130,000 nurses and other
health professionals over several decades. Half of the participants
were getting at least 14 percent of their calories from animal
protein and at least 4 percent from plant protein.
At the start of the study, participants were 49 years old on
average. Most were women.
By the end of the study, about 36,000 people died – about 8,850 of
cardiovascular disease and roughly 13,000 of cancer.
After accounting for lifestyle factors such as smoking, drinking,
obesity and physical inactivity, each 3 percent increase in calories
from plant protein was associated with a 10 percent lower risk of
death during the study period.
In contrast to the benefits seen with plants, each 10 percent
increase in the proportion of calories from animal protein was
associated with a 2 percent higher risk of death from any cause and
an 8 percent increased risk of death from cardiovascular disease
during the study period.
This association between animal protein and mortality was even
stronger for people who were obese or heavy drinkers, researchers
report in JAMA Internal Medicine.
“Obese individuals, as well as individuals with unhealthy lifestyle
choices are more likely to have underlying metabolic or inflammatory
disorders which could enhance the adverse effects of high animal
protein intake,” Dr. Pagona Lagiou, a nutrition researcher at the
University of Athens who wasn’t involved in the study said by email.
Animal protein, however, didn’t appear linked to higher mortality
for people with a healthy lifestyle. For these people, eating more
plant protein also didn’t seem tied to a longer life.
[to top of second column] |
Because the study was observational, it can’t prove that the type of
protein people eat directly influences how long they may live, the
authors note. It’s also possible that the eating and lifestyle
habits of healthcare workers might not be representative of the
broader population of adults.
The real risk of mortality from animal protein also appears largely
tied to processed meat, noted Dr. Dariush Mozaffarian, dean of the
Tufts Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy in Boston.
“Other animal source foods seem pretty neutral overall but represent
a diverse group, from chicken to eggs to yogurt, for which we need
to understand each of their specific health effects, outside any
single isolated nutrient such as protein,” Mozaffarian, who wasn’t
involved in the study, said by email.
“Based on a wealth of evidence, it’s crucial to eats lots of
specific, healthier plant-based foods: fruits, nuts, seeds, beans,
non-starchy veggies,” Mozaffarian added. “But don’t focus on
‘plant-based’ per se: a lot of the worst choices in the food supply
are plant-based, from French fries to soda to white bread and white
rice.”
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2aGeXoG JAMA Internal Medicine, online August
1, 2016.
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|