Tobacco, fast food in
easier reach of minority and low-income students
Send a link to a friend
[August 03, 2016]
By Erin Blakemore
(Reuters Health) - Compared to schools with
mostly white students, schools with higher numbers of Hispanic, black,
and low-income students are more likely to have tobacco retailers and
fast-food restaurants in easy reach, researchers say.
|
“Schools are places where we expect to be healthy, supportive
environments for kids, but right outside the door (students) could
be exposed to unhealthy influences,” lead author Heather D’Angelo of
Westat in Rockville, Maryland told Reuters Health in a phone
interview.
“I was surprised that there were so many tobacco outlets near
schools,” said D’Angelo, who at the time of the study was at the
University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill.
D’Angelo and her colleagues randomly selected more than 18,000
public schools in 97 U.S. counties, then analyzed their proximity to
retailers within an 800-meter radius – roughly equivalent to a
10-minute walk.
They report in the American Journal of Public Health that 40 percent
of the schools were near at least one fast food restaurant, 77
percent were close to at least one retailer likely to sell tobacco
products, and 38 percent of schools were close to both.
Schools with higher numbers of Hispanic, black, and low-income
students receiving free and reduced-price lunch were more likely to
have tobacco retailers and fast-food restaurants within a ten-minute
walk.
More than 50 percent of schools with a majority of Hispanic students
were within 800 meters of both a tobacco outlet and a fast food
outlet, compared to 21 percent of schools with a majority of white
students.
When researchers took population density into account, they found
that every 10 percent increase in the proportion of a school’s
Hispanic students was associated with a five percent higher
likelihood the school was within walking distance of places to buy
both tobacco and fast food.
A 10 percent increase in low-income students was associated with a
three percent higher likelihood a school was near both kinds of
stores.
The researchers also report that fast food and tobacco were more
easily accessible for older kids, suggesting “that retailers may be
well aware of and ready to take advantage of the autonomy and
purchasing power of older youths.”
“High schools had 40 percent more fast food restaurants and 24
percent more tobacco outlets within 800 meters than did primary
schools and high schools had nearly 1.5 times greater odds of having
both” nearby, they wrote.
The researchers say theirs is the first study to consider the
availability of both tobacco and fast food on the basis of students’
socioeconomic and racial characteristics.
[to top of second column] |
The study did not analyze how students get to school, whether they
leave campus during lunchtime, or where they live. Nor did the
researchers have data on students’ eating habits, or their weight or
health status.
“This is looking at one point in time,” said D’Angelo. “I can’t say
one thing causes another. However, there’s still an association
here.”
She noted that since the study only looked at fast food chains, the
number of restaurants serving unhealthy food in the areas studied
could be even higher.
D’Angelo and her co-authors argue that while licensing or zoning
policies could restrict students’ exposure to tobacco and unhealthy
foods, more research on neighborhood disparities is needed in order
to change public policy.
“Food and tobacco habits begin at a young age, and habits tend to
consolidate and ‘stick’ or ‘track’ over time,” said Steven H. Kelder,
an epidemiologist who was not involved with the study.
Kelder, who co-directs the Michael and Susan Dell Center for Healthy
Living at the University of Texas School of Public Health in Austin,
told Reuters Health by email that studies like this one provide
information on how to address growing health disparities based on
race and income and could point to the need for tighter restrictions
at the point of sale, or counter-marketing to students of color.
“In this country we have a history of commercially taking advantage
of poor, less educated, and vulnerable populations,” Kelder said.
“Documenting health disparities highlights the need to address
uncovered problems.”
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2ahmLde American Journal of Public Health,
online July 26, 2016.
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |