Column: Will government
workers facing Social Security cuts get relief?
Send a link to a friend
[August 05, 2016]
By Mark Miller
CHICAGO (Reuters) - Relief may soon be
on the way for more than 2 million Americans who face big cuts in
their Social Security benefits simply because they worked in
government jobs that come with a pension.
The reductions stem from two little-understood rules, the Windfall
Elimination Provision (WEP) and the Government Pension Offset (GPO).
Both are designed to prevent double-dipping from Social Security and
public-sector pensions.
The cuts in benefits can be very sharp. Under the WEP, a worker
retiring this year who might otherwise receive a $976 monthly Social
Security benefit could see that chopped to $548, according to the
Congressional Research Service. The GPO can result in even sharper
cuts to spousal and survivor benefits.
“These are grossly unfair laws,” says Jessica Klement, legislative
director for the National Active and Retired Federal Employees
Association, one group that has lobbied to get rid of WEP and GPO.
Legislation has been introduced in both chambers of Congress that
would repeal both WEP and GPO, but the plan that seems to have
traction takes an incremental approach and focuses on WEP only.
The Equal Treatment of Public Servants Act of 2015, sponsored by
Representative Kevin Brady, a Texas Republican who chairs the
powerful Ways and Means Committee, initially aimed to reduce the WEP
penalty by 50 percent.
But a revised version that surfaced in July pushes that relief back
to 2026 and would only reduce the penalty by 14 percent, averaging
$77 per month for future retirees. If applied in 2016, the proposal
would help about 1.25 million beneficiaries.
The National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association would
prefer full repeal but supported the original version of Brady’s
bill. And the group is pushing back on the revisions.
“Full repeal is the holy grail,” Klement said.
WEP affected 1.7 million beneficiaries at the end of 2015, according
to the Social Security Administration, while GPO impacted about
652,000.
WHY WEP AND GPO?
Why would government workers be treated differently from everyone
else? The answer begins with the way that Social Security benefits
are distributed across wage-earners with varying incomes.
Social Security’s benefit formula is progressive; workers with low
average lifetime earnings get a higher benefit amount compared with
their earnings than people who are better paid.
The formula does not distinguish between workers who had low wages
and those who worked for part of their careers in jobs not covered
by Social Security. Many federal and state jobs are outside the
system because they are covered by government pension plans.
The WEP aims to eliminate the high benefit return these workers get
on their Social Security income when they are not really low-income.
[to top of second column] |
Employees of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management return to their
building during the lunch hour in Washington June 5, 2015.
REUTERS/Gary Cameron
The impact of the WEP is reduced for workers who spend 21 to 29 years in Social
Security-covered work, and it is eliminated entirely for those who spend 30
years or more in such jobs.
For federal employees, the WEP applies only to workers who started their federal
employment before 1983, were covered by the Civil Service Retirement System and
did not contribute to Social Security.
The provision does not apply to people covered by the newer Federal Employees
Retirement System, which is a defined contribution plan. Those workers
contribute to Social Security.
WEP and GPO make some sense to policy folks but look unfair to beneficiaries,
who believe they are entitled to the full benefit earned in private-sector work
- full stop.
Moreover, the cuts can come as a surprise when workers file for benefits. Until
2005, no law required employers to tell workers they were affected. Even now,
they must only inform new workers of the possible impact on Social Security
benefits earned in other jobs.
The annual statement of benefits issued by the Social Security Administration
has included a description of the possible impact of WEP and GPO since 2007; for
workers who are affected, the statement includes a link to an online tool to
help them calculate the impact (http://bit.ly/2aTCFvG).
People who have worked only in jobs not covered by Social Security get a letter
indicating that they are not eligible.
If you think your Social Security benefits might be affected by WEP or GPO,
check out this page of resources on the topic from the Social Security
Administration (http://bit.ly/2axfdBK).
(Editing by Lauren Young and Lisa Von Ahn)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|