|
 The chemicals – known as PFASs (for polyfluoroalkyl and
perfluoroalkyl substances) – are used in products ranging from food
wrappers to clothing to nonstick cookware to fire-fighting foams.
They have been linked with an increased risk of kidney and
testicular cancers, hormone disruption, high cholesterol, and
obesity.
“PFASs are a group of persistent manmade chemicals that have been in
use since 60 years ago,” said lead study author Xindi Hu, a public
health and engineering researcher at Harvard T.H. Chan School of
Public Health in Boston and Harvard University in Cambridge,
Massachusetts.
Once these chemicals get into the water, they’re hard to get out, Hu
added by email.
“Most current wastewater treatment processes do not effectively
remove PFASs,” Hu said.
The problem may be much more widespread than the current study
findings suggest because researchers lacked data on drinking water
from smaller public water systems and private wells that serve about
one-third of the U.S. population - about 100 million people, Hu
noted.
To assess how many people may be exposed to PFASs in drinking water
supplies, researchers looked at concentrations of six types of these
chemicals in more than 36,000 water samples collected nationwide by
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from 2013-2015.
They also looked at industrial sites that manufacture or use PFASs,
military training sites and civilian airports where fire-fighting
foam containing PFASs is used; and at wastewater treatment plants.
Discharges from these plants—which are unable to remove PFASs from
wastewater by standard treatment methods—could contaminate
groundwater, researchers note in the journal Environmental Science
and Technology Letters. So could the sludge that the plants generate
and which is frequently used as fertilizer.
The study found that PFASs were detectable at the minimum reporting
levels required by the EPA in 194 out of 4,864 water supplies in 33
states across the U.S.
Drinking water from 13 states accounted for 75 percent of the unsafe
supply, led by California, New Jersey, North Carolina, Alabama,
Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio, New York, Georgia, Minnesota, Arizona,
Massachusetts, and Illinois.
Sixty-six of the public water supplies examined, serving six million
people, had at least one water sample that measured at or above what
the EPA considers safe for human consumption.
The highest levels of PFASs were detected near industrial sites,
military bases, and wastewater treatment plants—all places where
these chemicals may be used or found.
[to top of second column] |
One limitation of the study is that researchers lacked data on how
long people lived in areas supplied by contaminated water or how
much of this water people actually drank, the authors note. The risk
of many health problems linked to the chemicals is associated with
long-term exposure.
A second Harvard study from one of the co-authors on the paper,
Philippe Grandjean, focused on a new potential health problem tied
to PFASs.
Grandjean and colleagues studied nearly 600 adolescents from the
Faroe Islands, an island country off the coast of Denmark, who
received vaccines to protect against diphtheria and tetanus.
The subset of these teens exposed to PFASs at a young age had
lower-than-expected levels of antibodies against diphtheria and
tetanus despite receiving vaccinations, according to the study in
the journal Environmental Health Perspectives.
This suggests that PFASs, which are known to interfere with immune
function, may be involved in reducing the effectiveness of vaccines
in children, the authors conclude.
Previous research has found lower responses to vaccinations at ages
5 and 7 with exposure to the chemicals, Grandjean said by email. The
current study in teens suggests that the problem persists as
children get older.
“So the negative effects on immune functions appear to be lasting,”
Grandjean said. “Sadly, there is very little that an exposed
resident can do, once the exposure has led to an increased amount of
PFASs in the body.”
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2aPdBat Environmental Science and Technology
Letters and http://bit.ly/2bcj8cf Environmental Health Perspectives,
both online August 9, 2016.
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 |
