Appeals court suspends ruling rejecting
parts of Wisconsin voter ID law
Send a link to a friend
[August 11, 2016]
(Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court on
Wednesday suspended a July 19 ruling by a federal judge that struck down
parts of Wisconsin's voter ID law, the Department of Justice said.
Under the ruling by U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman, Wisconsin voters
who did not have photo identification would have been able to vote in
the Nov. 8 presidential election.
A Justice Department statement said that the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the 7th Circuit issued a stay concluding "both that the district court’s
decision is likely to be reversed on appeal and that disruption of the
state’s electoral system in the interim will cause irreparable injury.”
Wisconsin is one of several Republican-led states that have passed voter
ID laws in recent years amid fear of fraudulent voting by illegal
immigrants and others. The nine states with the strictest laws,
insisting on state-issued photo identification for voters, include
Texas, Virginia, Indiana and Georgia.
Republicans say voter ID laws are needed to prevent voter fraud. But
Democrats say the laws are really intended to make it more difficult for
poor African-Americans and Latinos, who skew Democratic in their
politics, to vote.
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, a Republican, called Wednesday's
appeals court decision "a step in the right direction."
[to top of second column] |
"Voters in Wisconsin support voter ID, and our administration will
continue to work to make it easy to vote and hard to cheat," Walker
said in a statement.
In a separate but related case, another federal judge on July 29
struck down a string of Wisconsin voting restrictions passed by the
Republican-led legislature and ordered the state to revamp its voter
identification rules, finding that they disenfranchised minority
voters.
U.S. District Judge James Peterson, ruling in a legal challenge to
the laws by two liberal groups, said he could not overturn the
entire voter ID law because a federal appeals court had already
found such restrictions to be constitutional.
(Reporting by Eric Walsh; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama and Grant
McCool)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |