Among women aged 50 to 74, those without a high risk for breast
cancer or dense breast tissue didn’t have an increase in breast
cancer deaths if they went for mammography every three years instead
of every two years.
But with dense breasts and a higher risk for these tumors, yearly
mammograms were associated with fewer breast cancer deaths than
screening every other year, researchers report in the Annals of
Internal Medicine.
“Women at low risk and low breast density will experience more harms
with little added benefit with annual and biennial screening
compared to triennial screening, whereas women with dense breasts
and high breast cancer risk may have added benefit from annual
compared to biennial mammography,” lead study author Amy Trentham-Dietz
of the University of Wisconsin-Madison said by email.
Doctors are conflicted about when and how often to recommend routine
screening mammograms for women who don’t have lumps or discomfort in
their breasts. Even though these exams can save lives, they can
sometimes subject women to unnecessary and painful treatments that
don’t find tumors or lower their risk of dying from cancer.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0bad8/0bad8564a412077efc55caaa9d1ed145a28e3087" alt=""
Last year, the American Cancer Society shifted its guidelines to
encourage women to start annual screenings at 45 instead of 40 and
to cut back to every other year once they turn 55.
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends mammograms every
other year for women ages 50 to 74.
Worldwide, breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women.
About one in nine women will eventually develop it, and the risk
increases with age and when a woman’s mother, sister or daughter has
been diagnosed with the disease.
Typically, if there is a suspicious area on a mammogram, women get
additional imaging to rule out cancer, followed by a biopsy if more
information is still needed to determine if the suspect cells are
malignant. When the extra tests don’t find cancer, the mammogram
result is considered a “false positive.”
For the current study, researchers estimated the odds of false
positive mammograms, biopsies that didn’t find cancer and deaths
averted based on age, cancer risk factors and breast density.
Compared with screening every two years, getting mammograms every
three years could reduce false positives, biopsies and
over-diagnosis without much effect on the number of cancer deaths
averted for the majority of women – the ones with average cancer
risk and lower breast density.
[to top of second column] |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f566e/f566e9536fb16d6899a28875274bc31656b73e17" alt=""
When women had a high risk of breast cancer, however, annual
screening was better regardless of breast density, noted Dr.
Christine Berg of Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in
Baltimore, who wrote an accompanying editorial.
However, “breast cancers are also more difficult to detect in dense
breasts,” Berg added by email. “Therefore annual mammograms allow
for comparison of subtle changes.”
The way women know if they have dense breasts is to get a mammogram
- and density can change over time, noted Dr. Pamela DiPiro of the
Dana Farber Cancer Institute in Boston.
“Annual mammography is a patient's best chance of detecting breast
cancer early, with the known caveat that additional imaging,
ultrasound or even a benign biopsy may be recommended,” DiPiro, who
wasn’t involved in the study, said by email.
Still, the take-home message for women is complicated, said Dr.
Kathryn Evers, director of mammography at Fox Chase Cancer Center in
Philadelphia.
“There are numerous risk factors for breast cancer and women have
different levels of comfort with the risks and benefits involved,”
Evers, who wasn’t involved in the study, said by email.
“The fact that there are so many different recommendations regarding
when and how often women should be screened points out that there
are no definitive answers – women should talk to their doctors about
what regimen will be best for them, taking all of these factors into
account,” Evers added.
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2bbf/a2bbf5e661758d2826efda438167ef726c3db898" alt="" |