Tech firms' encryption foe struggles for
U.S. Senate re-election
Send a link to a friend
[August 25, 2016]
By Dustin Volz
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. senator seen
by Silicon Valley as one of the technology industry's main foes in
Congress is fighting for his political life as Donald Trump's slumping
poll numbers threaten to damage Republican candidates across the board.
Senator Richard Burr from North Carolina, the chairman of the Senate
Intelligence Committee, is facing a strong and unexpected challenge from
Democrat Deborah Ross.
Though tech policy is unlikely to decide the race, a Burr defeat would
remove from the scene a lawmaker who has feuded with U.S. tech companies
over digital privacy and encryption.
Ross, a former head of the state's chapter of the American Civil
Liberties Union, is fighting an uphill battle.
North Carolina has voted Republican in every presidential election from
1980 until 2008, when it backed Barack Obama by a thin margin. The state
went for Republican Mitt Romney in 2012.
Burr, 60, was not expected to face a challenge this year, in what he has
said will be his last congressional campaign. But Republican
presidential candidate Trump's numbers have slumped nationwide and in
North Carolina, a battleground state in the Nov. 8 presidential
election.
Declining support for Trump, a property developer and television
personality who has never held elected office, has put Burr, who
endorsed Trump, and other Republicans in jeopardy, said Carter Wrenn, a
Republican consultant in North Carolina.
“We’re not sure it’s a wave here for Democrats, but it’s beginning to
look that way,” Wrenn said. “Any Republican running down here ought to
be very concerned about Trump’s impact.”

A poll from NBC News/Wall Street Journal/Marist in early August showed
Ross leading Burr 46 percent to 44 percent, though other polls have
given Burr a narrow edge.
Burr has been in Congress for more than 20 years and is distantly
related to Aaron Burr, U.S. vice president in the early 1800s. If Burr
were to lose, Democrats would be one seat closer to reclaiming a Senate
majority from Republicans.
APPLE VERSUS BURR
The concerns of companies such as Apple Inc, Google and Facebook are not
a key issue for North Carolina voters, but the race's outcome could
affect future handling of data encryption and privacy matters.
For a year, Burr has been crafting legislation that would force Apple
and other companies to weaken the security of their products in a way
that would give U.S. law enforcement access to encrypted devices and
communications. [uL2N18L28M]
The FBI has said that the growth of strong default encryption makes it
more difficult for investigators to access communications of criminal
suspects, even with a warrant.
Silicon Valley, cyber security experts and civil liberties advocates say
strong encryption is essential to ward off hackers and maintain the
overall security of the Internet.
The encryption debate is decades old, but it boiled over earlier this
year due to a dispute between Apple and the FBI over unlocking an iPhone
linked to one of the shooters in a San Bernardino, Calif., rampage in
2015.
Several U.S. tech companies and privacy groups, asking not to be named
because they do not typically take public positions on candidates, told
Reuters they are eager to see Burr lose.
His efforts to require encryption backdoors in U.S. technology products
are the main reason. While other lawmakers have been critical of Silicon
Valley in the encryption debate, none has been as antagonistic as Burr,
the sources said.
[to top of second column] |

Senator Richard Burr (R-NC) (C), flanked by Senator John McCain
(R-AZ) (L) and Senator Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) (R), speaks at a news
conference to talk about new legislation to restrict prisoner
transfers from the detention center at Guantanamo Bay, at the U.S.
Capitol in Washington DC January 13, 2015. REUTERS/Jonathan
Ernst/File Photo

Andrew McLaughlin, a former White House technology official who now
is head of content at the publishing site Medium, tweeted in May:
“Trump’s win endangers GOP Senators. America’s tech community should
rally to defeat Richard Burr, for his idiotic war on Internet
security.”
McLaughlin declined an interview request from Reuters.
Burr spokeswoman Becca Glover Watkins said the senator had worked
closely with California Senator Dianne Feinstein, the top Democrat
on the intelligence panel on the encryption issue.
She said the two had worked on a "number of bipartisan national
security issues including their encryption proposal" and Burr
planned to continue engaging with tech companies "on the challenges
posed by encryption and cyber threats."
ROSS UNCLEAR ON ENCRYPTION
Ross, a lawyer and former state legislator, has not clarified
whether she sides with Apple in its dispute with the FBI. In a
statement to Reuters, she said that “protecting our law abiding
citizens’ privacy doesn’t mean sacrificing our security.”
Tech interests, so far, have not donated sizeable amounts of money
to Ross, according to a review of contributions.
However, Laurene Powell Jobs, the widow of Apple co-founder Steve
Jobs, in June made an unspecified donation to Ross, according to
U.S. Federal Election Commission records.
The political action committee that supports Oregon Senator Ron
Wyden, a Democrat, vocal defender of encryption and frequent
opponent of Burr, gave $5,000 to Ross this year. Burr’s PAC later
gave $5,000 to Wyden’s Republican challenger in Oregon.

At a national level, Apple CEO Tim Cook and other tech executives
have helped raise money for Democratic presidential candidate
Hillary Clinton.
Silicon Valley has almost universally shunned Trump, troubled
largely by his rhetoric on immigration and his stated desire to shut
down the Internet to fight extremists.
(Reporting by Dustin Volz; Editing by Kevin Drawbaugh and Alistair
Bell)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |