| 
		 
		 
		ON TOP OF 
		TOP SALARIES AND HEALTH CARE, AFSCME CONTRACT INCLUDES LESSER KNOWN 
		PROVISIONS UNHEARD OF IN PRIVATE SECTOR 
		Illinois Policy Institute 
		  
		AFSCME’S outrageous demands when 
		negotiating for a new contract led to an impasse in negotiations. Now 
		the union is suing to keep the state from implementing the contract – 
		while ignoring that state workers will maintain many lavish perks unlike 
		anything offered in the private sector. 
			 | 
        
        
            
					
 The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees is suing the 
state to keep it from implementing its contract with state employees. 
 
Despite AFSCME’s protests, the new contract actually includes many lavish perks 
found in the previous contract. 
 
Many of these benefits are unlike anything offered in the private sector. 
 
Lax disciplinary procedures for absent or late employees 
 
A state worker can have 10 unauthorized absences in a two-year period of time 
without any real repercussions. 
At the 11th unauthorized absence, the employee will receive a five-day 
suspension. It isn’t until an employee has 12 unauthorized absences in a 
two-year period of time that the state can discharge the employee. 
The contract specifically provides that “[t]here shall be no general policy of 
docking for late arrival.” An employee can be up to an hour late to work – 
without being docked pay – as long as it is not done “repeatedly.” 
More than 15 different leaves of absence – including leave to perform union work
  
The state is required to keep available a job for a state worker who is elected 
to state office until the state official’s elected term is over. 
As many as 30 
employees at a time can be granted leaves of absence – for up to two years each 
– to serve as AFSCME representatives or officers at the international, state or 
local level. 
There are multiple leaves to pursue educational opportunities. 
In most cases – such as leave for union office and educational leave – state 
employees continue to accumulate seniority. Because seniority is the main 
consideration in a number of employment decisions – from vacation and overtime 
preference to order of layoff – that is a big deal. It means an employee not 
working for the state can maintain a position of higher seniority than someone 
who has been working for the state all along. 
 
[to top of second column]  | 
            
             
            
			  The governor’s offer not only kept all of these leaves of 
			absence, it also added bereavement leave. If a state worker’s son, 
			daughter, stepson or stepdaughter dies, that worker is entitled to 
			three days’ bereavement leave, with pay, in addition to any other 
			time off the employee would like to utilize. 
			 
			Generous holiday pay 
			 
			While the governor’s offer does alter overtime pay for holidays, 
			AFSCME employees will still receive pay that far surpasses the norm 
			in the private sector: 
			 
			Employees will receive time-and-a half pay (as opposed to the 
			original double time pay) for working on a standard holiday. 
			AFSCME employees will still receive even more for “super 
			holidays,” which include Labor Day, Thanksgiving and Christmas Day. 
			If an employee works on a super holiday, he or she will receive 
			double time pay (as opposed to the original 
			double-and-one-half-times pay under the old contract). 
			Of course, these overtime perks differ from what is required 
			under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, which does not require 
			any overtime pay at all for work on holidays. 
			 
			Even with the adjustments to overtime pay in Rauner’s offer, AFSCME 
			employees will still receive holiday overtime benefits beyond what 
			is expected in the private sector. 
			 
			By failing to acknowledge that the contract still includes such 
			lavish benefits – and by pursuing litigation to obtain even more – 
			AFSCME proves just how out of touch it is with the taxpayers it 
			expects to pay for those benefits. 
			
            
			Click here to respond to the editor about this article 
			
			
			  
			 |