| 
						 
						Morgan Stanley's 
						commodities head swaps swagger for small and smart 
						
		 
		Send a link to a friend  
 
		
		
		 [December 06, 2016] 
		By Olivia Oran 
		 
		 
		NEW 
		YORK (Reuters) - Nancy King, global head of commodities trading at 
		Morgan Stanley, has spent the last few years remodeling what used to be 
		one of the most profitable units on Wall Street, by downsizing and 
		focusing on smaller, smart trades for customers instead of the big, 
		risky bets it used to make on its own account. 
		 
		The shift in strategy, which has cut the size of Morgan Stanley's 
		commodities business by roughly two thirds, was largely forced on the 
		bank by post-financial crisis regulations that banned banks from using 
		their own money on potentially risky speculation, and increased capital 
		requirements. 
		 
		The bank is "sticking their toe back into the market,” said Robert 
		Pease, senior counsel at law firm Bracewell and a former commodity and 
		energy market regulator. 
		 
		Morgan Stanley's former crown jewel - built up from the 1990s into a 
		swaggering unit specializing in big bets - has been hemmed in by 
		regulations that have eaten into profits. 
		 
		Long-dated derivatives pegged to energy prices that once delivered fat 
		margins now fall under onerous capital requirements. 
		 
		The Federal Reserve no longer wants banks transporting natural gas or 
		stockpiling sheets of aluminum. And the Volcker Rule, part of the 2010 
		Dodd-Frank Act designed to prevent another crisis, prohibits lenders 
		from proprietary trading, precluding speculative bets on oil and other 
		volatile commodities. 
		 
		As a result, Morgan Stanley sold big chunks of the business that ran 
		afoul of such rules, losing roughly two-thirds of commodities staff in 
		the process. Its exposure to physical commodities has dropped to $179 
		million, down from $9.7 billion in 2011. 
						
		
		  
						
		Before the financial crisis, the business was one of Morgan Stanley's 
		most lucrative operations, generating annual revenue of as much as $3 
		billion with about 400 employees. It now produces around $1 billion in 
		revenue with 150 employees. 
		 
		Commodities trading is no longer a unit unto itself. King and her 
		business now report to Sam Kellie-Smith, who heads fixed-income trading. 
		Previously, the business answered to the head of the larger 
		institutional division that included trading and investment banking. 
		 
		LEARNING CURVE 
		 
		King, a 30-year veteran of Morgan Stanley who started in 1986 as an oil 
		trader, was named the sole global head of commodities in June after 
		global co-head Peter Sherk resigned. 
		 
		She declined to speak publicly to Reuters about her plans. 
		 
		With the backing of Kellie-Smith, King is urging staff across the bank 
		to generate more commodities revenue from customers - as opposed to 
		making its own bets - according to people familiar with the strategy. 
		 
		Earlier this year, the commodities group moved from its suburban campus 
		in Purchase, New York, to Morgan Stanley's Times Square headquarters in 
		New York City, some 30 miles (48 km) south. 
		 
		Some commodities traders are now seated near fixed-income staff to 
		improve the flow of information. The metals team sits near the foreign 
		exchange desk, for example, as the two have an overlapping client base. 
		That way, salespeople can offer gold hedges to a client, alongside 
		currencies, to protect against inflation. 
		 
		Metals traders can now also use risk management tools and technology 
		from the fixed income desk to help with pricing, and make better use of 
		its electronic trading business. 
		 
		The commodities group is also holding 'teach-ins' with colleagues in 
		other parts of the firm, such as investment banking and capital markets, 
		to encourage them to pitch commodity-related products to clients. 
		 
		The aim is to win business from existing Morgan Stanley investor clients 
		who have not typically included commodities in their portfolios, as well 
		as new corporate clients the bank may have dismissed earlier as the 
		opportunity was seen as too small. 
		 
		For example, Morgan Stanley is helping plastics businesses hedge the raw 
		materials used to produce bottles. It is also working with industrial 
		companies to hedge exposure to the cost of polyethylene and 
		polypropylene used in their packaging. 
			
			
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
            
			
			  
            
			Nancy King of Morgan Stanley is shown in this undated photo provided 
			by Morgan Stanley in New York, December 2, 2016. Courtesy of Larry 
			Lettera/ Wagner Photos/Morgan Stanley/Handout via REUTERS 
            
			
  
		
		While Morgan Stanley has worked with mining companies in the past to 
		help them lock in their future gold or ore production at set prices, it 
		is looking at new ways for these businesses to think about hedging, such 
		as energy usage. 
			
		
		"It's more small wins and focusing on areas and clients that in the past 
		haven't been as profitable," said Craig Pirrong, a finance professor at 
		the University of Houston who specializes in commodities. "Businesses 
		that didn't look as lucrative for banks before are looking better now." 
		 
		BARRIERS TO SUCCESS 
		 
		However, bankers, traders and industry experts said Morgan Stanley still 
		has challenges. 
		 
		First, the bank faces stiff competition in commodities markets. Not just 
		from rival banks that want to do the same kind of business, like Goldman 
		Sachs Group Inc and Citigroup Inc, but also from non-bank trading firms 
		such as Mercuria Energy Group, Vitol SA, Glencore Plc and Trafigura 
		Group Pte, that do not face the tough regulations lenders do. 
			
		
		Second, if President-elect Donald Trump makes good on his campaign 
		promise to dismantle the Dodd-Frank Act, and does away with the Volcker 
		rule, proprietary trading may make a comeback, which might force Morgan 
		Stanley into another rethink. 
		 
		In the meantime, if the Federal Reserve becomes more lenient on capital 
		rules and physical commodities, Morgan Stanley may also be at a 
		disadvantage for cutting back on businesses that its chief rival, 
		Goldman, has kept. 
		 
		"If in fact the clock can be turned back, there may be some aspects of 
		what Morgan Stanley used to do that they might want to explore, but 
		cultures have changed," said Guy Moszkowski, a banking analyst with 
		Autonomous Research. "It's very hard to rebuild." 
			
		
		Morgan Stanley had planned to make a big push into inventory financing, 
		where it would lend to buyers of natural resources, using physical 
		inventory as collateral, people familiar with the strategy told Reuters. 
			
		
		  
			
		
		 
		 
		But that plan is no longer a priority, the people said, after the 
		Federal Reserve's September move to propose new requirements for banks 
		to hold billions of dollars of extra capital in their commodities 
		business, which would depress returns in inventory financing and other 
		businesses. 
		 
		Bruce Bullock, director of the Maguire Energy Institute at Southern 
		Methodist University's Cox School of Business, said Morgan Stanley can 
		still make its reduced and redesigned commodities unit work. 
		 
		"The bank's job is to know their clients backwards and forwards and to 
		manage their risks better than the average trading house," he said. "If 
		banks can maintain this deep view of the business, they'll win." 
		 
		(Reporting by Olivia Oran in New York; Additional reporting by Jessica 
		Resnick-Ault and Catherine Ngai; Editing by Lauren Tara LaCapra and Bill 
		Rigby) 
				 
			[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  |