| 
			 
						
						
						 U.S. 
						court puts Obamacare case on hold until Trump takes 
						office 
			
   
            
			Send a link to a friend  
 
			
		[December 06, 2016] 
		By Lawrence Hurley 
			
		WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A federal appeals 
		court on Monday brought to an end President Barack Obama's bid to 
		overturn a ruling that threatens to gut his signature healthcare law by 
		putting the case on hold until after President-elect Donald Trump, who 
		aims to repeal Obamacare, takes office. 
             | 
        
        
            | 
             
			
			 The Obama administration had appealed a judge's May ruling favoring 
			the challenge filed by Republicans in the U.S. House of 
			Representatives against a key part of the 2010 law. But the U.S. 
			Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit agreed to a 
			request by the Republicans to delay its consideration of the 
			government's appeal until after Trump takes office on Jan. 20. 
			 
			The Obama administration opposed the move. 
			 
			If the law is repealed by Congress, the case would be moot. The 
			court's decision to put the case on hold will not have an immediate 
			effect on the law, as the lower court ruling was put on hold pending 
			the appeal. The court said both sides should provide an update on 
			the status of the case by Feb. 21. 
			  
			The challenge targeted government reimbursements to insurance 
			companies to compensate them for reductions that the law required 
			them to make to customers' out-of-pocket medical payments. 
			 
			Trump has said he favors repealing and replacing Obamacare but would 
			consider retaining certain elements. 
			 
			The law has enabled millions of previously uninsured Americans to 
			obtain health insurance, but Republicans condemn Obamacare as a 
			government overreach and have mounted a series of legal challenges. 
			 
			The Obama administration appealed U.S. District Judge Rosemary 
			Collyer's ruling that the government cannot spend billions of 
			dollars in federal funds without congressional approval to provide 
			subsidies under the healthcare law to private insurers to help 
			people afford medical coverage. 
			
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
  
            
			The House Republicans argued that the administration violated the 
			U.S. Constitution because it is the legislative branch, not the 
			executive branch, that authorizes government spending. 
			 
			The Obama administration has interpreted the provision as a type of 
			federal spending that does not need to be explicitly authorized by 
			Congress. 
			 
			The U.S. Supreme Court in 2012 and 2015 issued major rulings 
			authored by conservative Chief Justice John Roberts that preserved 
			Obamacare and rejected conservative challenges. 
			 
			(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Will Dunham) 
			[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			
			  
			
			
			   |