U.S.
attorneys argue Aetna-Humana deal violates antitrust law
Send a link to a friend
[December 06, 2016]
By Diane Bartz
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. Justice
Department attorney told a federal judge on Monday that health insurer
Aetna Inc's planned acquisition of Humana Inc would break antitrust law
by reducing competition in Medicare Advantage and Obamacare exchange
businesses, kicking off a trial expected to last weeks.
|
The Justice Department filed a lawsuit in July asking the court to
stop Aetna's $34 billion deal for Humana, arguing it would lead to
higher prices for seniors and the disabled on Medicare and for
people who use the individual insurance program created under the
Affordable Care Act, popularly known as Obamacare.
Aetna defended the deal on Monday, arguing that Medicare Advantage
competes with the government's traditional Medicare program for
elderly or disabled patients. It also said that it plans to stay out
of the Obamacare exchanges in the near future.
Both programs, as well as antitrust enforcement, could face changes
under Republican President-elect Donald Trump.
Justice Department lawyer Craig Conrath told Judge John Bates of the
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia that traditional
government-managed Medicare does not compete with Medicare
Advantage, which is run by insurers.
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2016/Aug/26/images/ads/current/humanesociety_sda022411.png)
A witness called by the government, Aetna executive Nancy Cocozza,
president of Aetna's Medicare Business, was shown internal documents
that appeared to show that Aetna considered Humana a major
competitor but not original Medicare. The documents were not visible
in the court.
Shown one assessment of top competitors that did not have Medicare,
Cocozza protested, "These are MA (Medicare Advantage) competitors
but there are others."
Conrath also said that Aetna's plan to largely exit the Obamacare
exchanges in 2017 should be disregarded because the company could
re-enter the market as soon as 2018 if it chooses. Conrath said
written communications showed that Aetna left Obamacare because of
the antitrust lawsuit.
Aetna has said it would not return to the exchanges until 2019 at
the earliest.
Share prices of both companies dropped Monday. Humana closed down
2.2 percent at $208.83 while Aetna was down 3 percent at $129.45.
[to top of second column] |
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2016/Dec/06/images/ads/current/Morieary_Harris_lda_christmas_2016.png)
Aetna attorney John Majoras argued that traditional Medicare and
Medicare Advantage did compete, citing a U.S. government website.
There could soon be more competition, he said, noting "entry has
been common and it has been widespread."
Majoras also argued that the Obamacare exchanges were unprofitable
and said that was the real reason the company planned to drop out of
11 of the 15 states where they are on the exchanges. "The result to
Aetna has been mounting losses," Majoras said. "Humana's losses were
actually even a bit worse."
The Justice Department filed another lawsuit in July to stop Anthem
Inc's planned $45 billion purchase of Cigna Corp. That trial is
underway in the same courthouse. The trials will be over before
Trump's inauguration on Jan. 20. He has pledged to repeal and
replace Obamacare and has said Medicare should be modernized.
Humana is the second largest Medicare Advantage insurer while Aetna
is the fourth, and the two compete in more than 600 counties, the
government said in its complaint.
(Reporting by Diane Bartz and Caroline Humer; Editing by Jonathan
Oatis and Leslie Adler)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2016/Dec/06/images/ads/current/best_friends_sda_120215.png)
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2016/Aug/26/images/ads/current/ldn_medical_directory_small_2016.png) |