Uber launches
self-driving car fleet in San Francisco despite warning
from regulator
Send a link to a friend
[December 15, 2016]
By Heather Somerville and Alexandria Sage
SAN
FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Uber Technologies Inc rolled out its self-driving
car fleet in its hometown of San Francisco on Wednesday, but faced a
backlash from state regulators who say the company needs a permit to
keep the vehicles on the road.
The California Department of Motor Vehicles sent a letter to Uber on
Wednesday ordering the company to "cease the operations" of its
autonomous cars until it applies for and receives the testing permit
required by the state.
Uber responded that it did not need the permit, because its cars require
a person to constantly monitor and take control of the wheel, which does
not meet the definition of autonomous.
"For us, it's still early days and our cars are not yet ready to drive
without a person monitoring them," Uber said in a company blog post.
It was the latest in a long line of spats between Uber and regulators,
and followed a fairly seamless rollout three months ago in Pittsburgh,
where Uber unveiled its secretive work on autonomous cars for the first
time to the public. The company started with just four self-driving cars
available to Pittsburgh passengers, although it had a fleet of more than
a dozen for testing.

The San Francisco program will mimic the Pittsburgh pilot. Riders who
request an UberX, one of the company's budget ride options, may be
matched with a self-driving Uber.
While 20 other companies exploring self-driving cars, including
Alphabet's Google, Tesla Motors and Ford Motor Co, have obtained a DMV
permit, Uber has not. Uber's self-driving cars have been seen around San
Francisco since at least September.
In its letter to Uber, the DMV's chief counsel said it "will initial
legal action" if "Uber does not confirm immediately that it will stop
its launch and seek a testing permit."
California defines autonomous vehicles as cars that have the
"capability" to drive "without the active physical control or monitoring
of a natural person." Uber argues that definition does not apply to its
cars, which are equipped with a driver and an engineer in the front
seats to take over in situations such as a construction zone, pedestrian
crossing or taking a left turn across a lane of traffic.
[to top of second column] |

India’s Minister of Law and Information and Technology Ravi Shankar
Prasad shakes hands with Uber CEO Travis Kalanick before the start
of their meeting in New Delhi, India, December 15, 2016. REUTERS/Adnan
Abidi

"All
of our vehicles are compliant with applicable federal and state laws," a
spokeswoman said.
In a company blog post, Uber called on California to take a more
"pro-technology" approach to regulating autonomous cars.
"Several cities and states have recognized that complex rules and requirements
could have the unintended consequence of slowing innovation," Uber said. "Our
hope is that California, our home state and a leader in much of the world's
dynamism, will take a similar view."
On Wednesday, local media aired a video of a self-driving Uber running a red
light, which was captured by a bystander. Uber said the incident was because of
human error - suggesting that the car was not in autonomous mode - and was not
carrying passengers, and the driver had been suspended.
(Editing by Alistair Bell and Peter Cooney)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 |