'Is a Tweet policy?' State Department
officials ponder
Send a link to a friend
[December 16, 2016]
By Arshad Mohammed
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - When is a tweet just
a tweet?
A debate is percolating in the U.S. State Department, where diplomats
measure their words with demitasse spoons, on how to handle Donald
Trump's Twitter commentary if he continues to tweet after he becomes
U.S. president on Jan. 20.
By tradition, anything the president says is regarded as U.S. policy and
can be repeated to foreign officials without fear of contradiction, at
least from the White House.
But Trump has questioned bedrock planks of U.S. policy, such as whether
Taiwan is part of "one China" or whether Washington would defend NATO
allies, causing consternation at home and abroad.
"I have never hesitated to take anything that POTUS said in speeches,
press conferences, and other remarks as anything but policy," a midlevel
diplomat who has served on four continents wrote Dec. 7 on an internal
State Department discussion board, in reference to the President of the
United States (POTUS).
"But what about tweets?" he asked.
"Given the president-elect's penchant for using (Twitter) in a much more
spontaneous context than most other USG officials, how should FSOs
regard those statements?" he added, referring to U.S. government (USG)
foreign service officers (FSOs).
"In theory, we all should have a firm grasp of what is hyberbole (sic)
and what is not, but in practice we should not be so sure. I for one am
done making assumptions in this area for at least the next four years,"
the diplomat added.
He then appealed to the State Department's Bureau of Public Affairs to
issue an ALDAC, or formal message to "All Diplomatic and Consular
Posts," clarifying matters.
The post, titled "Is a Tweet policy?" on "The Sounding Board," a forum
on the State Department's intranet, prompted thoughtful, though equally
perplexed, comments.
Another official wrote that he was confident President Barack Obama's
comments are to be taken "seriously and literally", Trump may want his
tweets to be taken both "seriously and figuratively," he wrote.
"Assuming there is a strategy here, it would seem that it would be to
create a sense of ambiguity around issues previously thought to be
settled for the purpose of leveraging a better deal to advance USG
interests," he added. "Miscommunication may be the very purpose of the
President Elect's tweets."
[to top of second column] |
President-elect Donald Trump speaks at the USA Thank You Tour event
at the Wisconsin State Fair Exposition Center in West Allis,
Wisconsin, U.S., December 13, 2016. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton
A spokesman for the State Department said it would have no comment
on how the next administration and president may use social media.
Obama has tweeted since 2015 from the account @POTUS.
Rather than suggesting specific policies, Obama used the handle to
encourage Americans to vote, to cheerlead for Hillary Clinton,
Trump's election opponent, and to remember the recently deceased,
including writer Elie Wiesel and golfer Arnold Palmer.
From his Twitter account, @realdonaldtrump, Trump has mocked Clinton
as "Crooked Hillary," attacked a former Miss Universe and sniped at
the parents of a Muslim American U.S. Army captain who died in Iraq
after the soldier's father spoke against him.
On Nov. 27, he tweeted "I won the popular vote if you deduct the
millions of people who voted illegally" but provided no evidence for
the claim, which electoral officials have denied. Trump lost the
popular vote by close to three million votes.
The president-elect has not said definitively whether he will
continue tweeting after Jan. 20. Trump's transition team did not
immediately respond to a request for comment.
A third official said the entire government would need to deal with
the issue to "limit the amount of miscommunication a specific POTUS
tweet could engender."
"As the great Bette Davis line goes, 'Fasten your seatbelt, it's
going to be a bumpy ride,'" he wrote.
(Reporting by Arshad Mohammed, additional reporting by Timothy
Gardner, Steve Holland and Matt Spetalnick; Editing by Andrew Hay)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |