| 
						With bylaw tweaks, Apple 
						grants activist one of three wishes 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [December 17, 2016] 
		By Ross Kerber and Stephen Nellis 
 BOSTON/SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Apple 
		Inc's board relaxed some rules for director nominations by outside 
		investors but stopped short of broader changes sought by an activist 
		shareholder.
 
 The new bylaws disclosed in a securities filing late on Thursday dealt 
		with the mechanics of "proxy access," the sometimes controversial 
		process allowing outside investors to nominate their own candidates to a 
		company's board.
 
 Just how much influence to give such investors has been a hot topic with 
		the rise of activist shareholders who some executives fear may not have 
		long-term corporate interests at heart. At Apple, this debate played out 
		several years ago when billionaire activist investor Carl Icahn 
		successfully urged an increase in share buybacks.
 
 Apple, the world's highest-valued publicly traded company, moved last 
		year to allow a group of up to 20 shareholders owning at least 3 percent 
		of its stock to include their own director candidates, constituting up 
		to 20 percent of the board, in its proxy materials.
 
		
		 
		Thursday's filing said shareholders also could re-nominate a director 
		candidate regardless of the level of support he or she had won in 
		earlier elections. Previously, shareholders were prohibited from 
		re-nominating candidates who had gotten less than 25 percent at either 
		of the company's last two annual meetings.
 Apple also extended a procedural deadline for nominating shareholders 
		and director candidates, and it limited its board's direction to 
		unilaterally interpret certain provisions, according to the filing.
 
 An Apple representative said the company would not comment beyond the 
		filing.
 
 Independent shareholder James McRitchie, who has pressed Apple to grant 
		more proxy access rights, said the changes were welcome, especially on 
		the re-nomination question. But he said Apple failed to address two of 
		his other, larger concerns.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
 
The logo of U.S. technology company Apple is seen in Zurich, Switzerland April 
5, 2016. REUTERS/Arnd Wiegmann 
 
McRitchie said in a telephone interview that he would prefer there be no limit 
to the number of investors needed to reach the 3 percent threshold for 
nominating a director and that the board should change its terms to allow 
investors to nominate up to two directors to its eight-member board, up from one 
currently.
 Both ideas, along with a request to do away with the limits on re-nominations, 
are in a shareholder proposal McRitchie submitted to the company for a vote at 
its next annual meeting, expected early next year.
 
 The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in October rejected a request by 
Apple to exclude the proposal. An agency lawyer said officials were "unable to 
conclude" Apple's current policies compare favorably with the activists' 
submission, as the company had argued, according to correspondence on the SEC's 
website.
 
 McRitchie, who owns about 600 shares of Apple, said he might be amenable to a 
compromise, but Apple has not spoken to him about one.
 
 "I'm a bug that's too small to register on their thick hide," he said.
 
 (Reporting by Ross Kerber in Boston and Stephen Nellis in San Francisco; Editing 
by Lisa Von Ahn)
 
				 
				 
			[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			 |