| 
		 
		U.S. chief justice refuses to force vote 
		on Obama high court pick 
		
		 
		Send a link to a friend  
 
		
		
		 [December 20, 2016] 
		By Lawrence Hurley 
		 
		WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Chief Justice 
		John Roberts on Monday rejected a New Mexico lawyer's long-shot bid to 
		force a Senate confirmation vote on President Barack Obama's Supreme 
		Court pick, Merrick Garland, after Republican senators refused to act on 
		his nomination. 
		 
		Steven Michel, a Santa Fe environmental attorney, filed suit in U.S. 
		federal court in August, arguing that the Republican-led Senate's 
		failure to act on Garland's nomination deprived Michel of his rights as 
		a voter under the U.S. Constitution's 17th Amendment, which outlines how 
		senators are elected. 
		 
		The U.S. Constitution calls on the president to nominate Supreme Court 
		justices, with confirmation of the selection in the hands of the Senate. 
		The Senate, in a move with little precedent in U.S. history, simply 
		refused to consider Garland's nomination, saying the winner of the Nov. 
		8 presidential election between Republican Donald Trump and Democrat 
		Hillary Clinton should make the pick. 
		 
		Michel lost in lower courts before Roberts denied the emergency 
		application on Monday without comment. 
		
		
		  
		
		Obama nominated Garland, a moderate appeals court judge, on March 16 to 
		fill the vacant seat on the high court created by the Feb. 13 death of 
		long-serving conservative Antonin Scalia. Trump, who takes office on 
		Jan. 20, will now make the appointment. 
		 
		On Jan. 18, Garland will resume hearing cases in his current position as 
		chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia 
		Circuit, according to the court's calendar. Garland had stepped aside 
		from hearing cases after Obama nominated him to the Supreme Court. 
		 
		
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
            
			  
            
			Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts departs after U.S. 
			President Barack Obama's State of the Union address to a joint 
			session of Congress in Washington, January 12, 2016. REUTERS/Joshua 
			Roberts 
            
			  
			The court currently has four conservative justices and four 
			liberals. Scalia's replacement could tilt its ideological balance 
			for years to come, restoring the long-standing conservative majority 
			just at a time when it appeared liberals would get an upper hand on 
			the bench. 
			 
			This could be pivotal in a wide range of issues including abortion, 
			the death penalty, religious rights, presidential powers, 
			transgender rights, federal regulations and others. 
			 
			Trump previously unveiled a list of 21 conservative jurists he would 
			consider for the job and said this month he had whittled the list 
			down to "probably three or four." Last week, Trump's incoming chief 
			of staff, Reince Priebus, said the announcement would be made close 
			the new president's Jan 20 inauguration. 
			 
			(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Will Dunham) 
			
			[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] 
			Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			   |