U.S. District Judge John Gleeson in Brooklyn, New York, did not rule
on whether he would put on hold his order requiring the unsealing of
a report by a federal monitor appointed as part of a $1.9 billion
pact with the U.S. Justice Department in 2012.
But Gleeson said he was "strongly inclined" to grant HSBC a stay of
his Jan. 28 order, and that a lawyer representing a HSBC mortgage
customer seeking its unsealing would be unlikely to convince him
otherwise.
"He's going to have a tough road convincing me otherwise," Gleeson
said in court.
Gleeson said he still wanted HSBC and prosecutors to propose
redactions to the report before the case is taken up on appeal. He
extended the deadline to complete that process from Feb. 12 to Feb.
26.
The hearing came after Gleeson ordered the release of a January 2015
report by Michael Cherkasky, a former New York prosecutor who was
appointed federal monitor as part a five-year deferred prosecution
agreement with HSBC.
The deal resolved charges that HSBC had become a "preferred
financial institution" for Mexican drug cartels and other money
launderers and conducted transactions for customers in several
countries subject to U.S. sanctions.
The report by Cherkasky, now the executive chairman of the
compliance company Exiger, was to be kept under wraps.
But Hubert Dean Moore of Pennsylvania, who said he had been an HSBC
mortgage customer before filing for bankruptcy, asked that it be
unsealed so he could review whether HSBC "continues to engage in
unsafe and unsound business practices."
[to top of second column] |
HSBC and the Justice Department have opposed unsealing the report.
They had argued unsealing the report could provide a "road map" for
criminals seeking to launder money and discourage people from
cooperating with the monitor.
Both HSBC and the Justice Department have filed notices of appeal.
Samuel Seymour, HSBC's lawyer, said on Tuesday the ruling had hurt
the bank by calling into question assurances given to foreign
regulators who, in being convinced to provide information to the
monitor, were told the report would be kept secret.
"It affects regulatory relationships it has today," he said in
court. "The harm is being felt now."
The case is U.S. v. HSBC Bank USA NA et al, U.S. District Court,
Eastern District of New York, No. 12-cr-00763.
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|