Losing membership in social groups during the retirement transition
may be tied to lower quality of life and higher risk of death over
the next six years, according to a new study of older adults in
England.
“As people reach the end of their working lives, they are typically
exposed to a lot of advice about how to plan their finances, medical
care, and physical exercise in order to have a long and healthy
retirement,” said lead author Niklas K. Steffens of The University
of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia.
Social group membership may not be a part of this discussion,
although the new results indicate that perhaps it should be,
Steffens told Reuters Health by email.
“Social groups provide you with a sense of identity,” he said.
“Amongst other things, they give you a sense of belonging, meaning,
and purpose.”
The researchers studied survey responses from 424 adults who retired
between 2002 and 2010 and 424 similar older adults who did not go
through the retirement transition. The surveys included questions on
work status, age, sex, subjective physical health, quality of life
and socioeconomic status.
The surveys also asked about membership in eight categories of
social groups, including social clubs, church or other religious
groups.
About three-quarters of both groups were married.
For those who retired and were members of two social groups while
still working, the risk of death over the next six years was 2
percent if they maintained both group memberships, 5 percent if they
lost one group membership and 12 percent if they lost both group
memberships, according to a report in BMJ Open.
Quality of life also decreased as group membership decreased.
“These effects are not small but are comparable with those derived
from regular physical exercise,” Steffens said.
This study provides initial evidence of some connection between
social groups and quality of life or mortality, but the statistics
didn’t really directly test number of membership changes, said Mo
Wang of the University of Florida, Warrington College of Business in
Gainesville, who was not involved in the analysis.
[to top of second column] |
Since the comparison group did not go through retirement, it is hard
to compare them to the retirement group, Wang told Reuters Health by
phone.
“The issue with this kind of study is causality is very difficult to
determine,” he said. “While my inclination is that social membership
would probably help directly or indirectly,” that’s not necessarily
the case based on this study, he said.
Healthier people are likely to join more groups and be more active
to start with, he noted.
In any case, an important part of joining a new group is making sure
it’s a good fit for you, he said – make sure you choose one you
enjoy and that does not cause you stress.
“If you are in the process of retiring and don’t belong to any
group, join one,” Steffens said. “If you exercise regularly, this is
also likely to be good for you and your health.”
Exercising in a group may be even better, he said.
“One important way for all of us to enhance the health of those who
are retired is to support them in their efforts to be part of groups
that provide them with a sense of communality and belonging,” he
said.
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/1XvP2Pf BMJ Open, online February 16, 2016.
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|