Supreme
Court denies stay request in North Carolina redistricting case
Send a link to a friend
[February 20, 2016]
(Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court
on Friday refused to stay a ruling that two North Carolina congressional
districts be redrawn over racial gerrymandering in a 2011 redistricting,
forcing congressional primaries to be rescheduled for June 7.
|
A lower court panel of federal judges this month barred elections
in the majority black districts, the 1st and the 12th, until new
maps are approved, calling the current maps unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court gave no explanation for its decision in a
one-sentence order issued late on Friday night.
The ruling said race had been the main factor when the
Republican-controlled legislature redrew the boundaries and state
lawmakers were not justified in using that benchmark.
Three voters filed suit in 2013 to invalidate the districts. Both
are represented by Democrats, with G.K. Butterfield in the 1st, and
Alma Adams in the 12th.
The primaries for the state's 13 U.S. House seats will be held on
June 7 rather than March 15 after North Carolina lawmakers agreed to
move the date on Thursday if the Supreme Court rejected the stay
request. The state's presidential and gubernatorial primaries will
still be held on March 15.
Broadcaster WRAL reported that while state lawmakers hoped for a
stay, legislators in the state's House on Friday moved ahead and
gave final approval to newly-drafted congressional maps ahead of the
Court's decision to reject the stay request.
[to top of second column] |
Politico reported that Justice Antonin Scalia had been expected to
vote in favor of staying the ruling before his death last Saturday,
though it was not immediately clear how his death affected the
court's decision.
(Reporting by Curtis Skinner in San Francisco; Editing by Clarence
Fernandez)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|