Dow <DOW.N>, in the process of merging with Dupont <DD.N>, on Friday
settled the decade-long dispute rather than risk its fate being
decided by a shorthanded, eight-justice court missing, in Scalia, a
reliable vote in support of companies in class action cases.
The Dow dispute, in which it was accused of conspiring to
artificially inflate polyurethane prices, had been on hold at the
high court pending the outcome of another case.
Following Scalia's Feb. 13 death, the court's conservative wing
lacks the five votes needed "to make dramatic new rules that curtail
class actions," said Paul Bland, executive director of consumer
advocacy group Public Justice.
Dow said in a statement that Scalia's death and the raging political
fight over naming his successor meant an "increased likelihood for
unfavorable outcomes for business involved in class action suits."
Two important class action cases were argued before the Supreme
Court during its current term with Scalia on the bench. Based on
November's oral argument, it appeared Tyson Foods Inc <TSN.N> would
lose its challenge to an almost $5.8 million class action judgment,
with or without Scalia's vote.
The court had put off its decision on whether to hear Dow's case
pending its decision in the Tyson Foods case.
A Wal-Mart Stores Inc <WMT.N> challenge to another class action
lawsuit also was on hold before the high court, awaiting the Tyson
ruling. Wal-Mart is seeking to throw out a $187 million class action
judgment over its treatment of workers in Pennsylvania.
Michael Donovan, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said there have not
been any settlement talks prompted by Scalia's death.
The other class action case heard by the Supreme Court this term
involved online search company Spokeo Inc. The court appeared
closely divided following November's oral argument, meaning it
potentially could be split 4-4. That would hand a victory to the
plaintiffs, although such a ruling would not set a national
precedent.
CURBING CLASS ACTIONS
With Scalia joining the four other conservative justices in the
majority, the court in recent years had issued a series of rulings
curbing class-action litigation against businesses. These included
significant victories for Wal-Mart in 2011 and Comcast Corp
<CMCSA.O> in 2013.
[to top of second column] |
In those two cases, Scalia wrote the majority opinion for the court.
The Comcast ruling was 5-4. The Wal-Mart decision was 5-4 on one
aspect and unanimous on another.
Scalia's absence may influence the court's decisions on which new
cases to hear. Four of the eight remaining justices must agree in
order for the court to take up a case.
As early as Monday, the court could say whether or not it will hear
a case involving Direct Digital LLC that class action lawyers are
watching closely. The dispute focuses on what evidence is needed to
show that members of a class have suffered an alleged injury.
Other class action cases that the Supreme Court must decide whether
to hear include another one filed by Wal-Mart that is a successor to
the gender discrimination suit that led to the 2011 ruling in the
retailer's favor.
Before Scalia's death, the justices also had agreed to hear an
appeal filed by Microsoft Corp<MSFT.O>, which is attempting to throw
out a class action lawsuit filed by Xbox 360 owners who contend that
the videogame console has a design defect that causes game discs to
be gouged. That case has not yet been scheduled for oral argument.
The court ruled on Jan. 20 against advertising firm Campbell-Ewald
in another class action case, allowing a lawsuit to proceed.
With President Barack Obama poised to nominate a successor but the
Republican-controlled Senate insisting that the next president, due
to take office in January 2017, fill the vacancy, the high court
could remain shorthanded for more than a year.
Any nominee picked by Obama or another Democratic president could be
expected to be more sympathetic to plaintiffs bringing class action
cases against businesses.
(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Will Dunham)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |