| 
             
			 Even though showering can lift patients’ spirits, potentially 
			speeding recovery, concerns about contamination often prompt doctors 
			to advise against getting wounds wet until stitches are removed, 
			which can take many days, or even weeks. 
			 
			But when researchers randomly permitted some patients with 
			relatively low-risk surgical wounds to shower 48 hours after their 
			operations, the people who got to bathe were happier with their care 
			- and their odds of infection were no different from those of their 
			unwashed peers. 
			 
			The findings, along with results from other recent research, should 
			help convince more doctors to let patients shower after surgery, 
			said Dr. Paul Dayton, a researcher at Des Moines University and 
			UnityPoint Health in Iowa who wasn’t involved in the study. 
			  
			  
			 
			“Traditions are sometimes long to fade away due to lack of good 
			evidence to support change – this paper will certainly help to drive 
			change,” Dayton said by email. “Early water exposure may in fact be 
			a universally safe recommendation.” 
			 
			For the current study, Dr. Jin-Shing Chen of National Taiwan 
			University Hospital and colleagues focused on patients with 
			relatively low-risk wounds, excluding people with infections, 
			inflammation or injuries caused by outside objects like bullet or 
			knives entering the body. 
			 
			The experiment included patients with “clean” wounds, the 
			lowest-risk category, with no signs of infection after less invasive 
			operations, and individuals with so-called “clean-contaminated” 
			wounds, which are uninfected but involve more complex operations 
			such as chest, ear or gynecologic procedures. 
			 
			The researchers enrolled 444 patients having surgeries on the 
			thyroid, lung, face, extremities and certain abdominal hernias. Half 
			the participants could shower 48 hours after the operations, while 
			the rest of them had to wait. 
			 
			Within two weeks of surgery, four patients in the shower group and 
			six in the unwashed group developed superficial surgical site 
			infections with redness and swelling, a difference that was too 
			small to rule out the possibility that it was due to chance. 
			
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
  
            
			All of the patients reported similar levels of pain after surgery, 
			but the ones who got to shower were more satisfied with their care. 
			One shortcoming of the study is that doctors knew which patients got 
			to shower and which didn’t, which has the potential to influence 
			outcomes, the authors note in the Annals of Surgery. Researchers 
			also lacked data on the longer-term infection risk since they only 
			followed patients for two weeks. 
			 
			It’s also important to note that patients who showered didn’t use 
			soap or cleanser at the surgical site or submerge the wound, noted 
			Dr. Heather Evans, an infectious disease and surgery researcher at 
			the University of Washington and Harborview Medical Center in 
			Seattle. 
			 
			All wounds in the study were also relatively small and probably 
			weren’t under tension that might lead to conditions that can trigger 
			infections, Evans, who wasn’t involved in the study, added by email. 
			 
			“I think the take-home message for patients from this particular 
			study is that showering with water within 48 hours after elective 
			surgery is safe if the surgical wound is small, had minimal 
			contamination, and was primarily closed with (stitches),” Evans 
			said. 
			
			  
			SOURCE: http://bit.ly/1NXvvRH Annals of Surgery, online December 10, 
			2015. 
			[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  |