| 
            
			 TranCanada's lawsuit in a federal court in Houston, Texas, called 
			rejection of its permit to build the pipeline unconstitutional. In a 
			separate action under the North American Free Trade Agreement 
			(NAFTA), the company said the pipeline permit denial was "arbitrary 
			and unjustified." 
			 
			The company's U.S. lawsuit does not seek monetary damages but wants 
			the permit denial invalidated and seeks a ruling that no future 
			president can block construction. Its request for $15 billion under 
			NAFTA reflects its desire to recover its investment in the pipeline. 
			 
			Defendants in the Houston lawsuit are U.S. Secretary of State John 
			Kerry, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, U.S. Homeland Security 
			Secretary Jeh Johnson and Sally Jewell, Secretary of the Department 
			of Interior. 
			 
			Obama, who is not named as a defendant, rejected the cross-border 
			crude oil pipeline last November, seven years after it was first 
			proposed, saying it would not make a meaningful long-term 
			contribution to the U.S. economy. 
			
			  The Keystone XL was designed to link existing pipeline networks in 
			Canada and the United States to bring crude from Alberta and North 
			Dakota to refineries in Illinois and, eventually, the Gulf of Mexico 
			coast. 
			 
			All the Democratic U.S. presidential candidates, including front 
			runner Hillary Clinton, oppose the pipeline while most Republican 
			candidates are in favor. 
			 
			Senator John Hoeven, a Republican from oil-producing North Dakota, 
			said Keystone's rejection had cost Americans jobs and now also put 
			taxpayers "on the hook for potentially billions of dollars in fines 
			and legal costs." 
			 
			In filing the NAFTA claim, TransCanada said it "had every reason to 
			expect its application would be granted" as it had met the same 
			criteria the U.S. State Department used when approving other similar 
			cross-border pipelines. 
			 
			Chapter 11 of the NAFTA trade agreement between Canada, Mexico and 
			the United States gives investors the right to make claims against 
			governments. 
			 
			Unlike Canada and Mexico, the United States has never lost a Chapter 
			11 NAFTA case. The NAFTA tribunal process, which cannot reverse the 
			president's decision, would likely be lengthy and expensive. 
			 
			TransCanada said it was "prepared for a lengthy process that could 
			take several years." 
			 
			James Rubin, an environmental regulatory lawyer with Dorsey & 
			Whitney, said Keystone’s federal court suit would be "challenging.” 
			He noted that courts have considered cross-border pipeline decisions 
			before and have generally found they fall within the president’s 
			discretion. 
			 
			The White House referred requests for comment to the U.S. State 
			Department. A State Department spokesperson said it would not 
			comment on pending litigation. 
			 
			
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
            
			  
			In Ottawa, a spokesman for the Canadian foreign ministry said the 
			government "has no role in this dispute." 
			 
			Since October, Canada has been run by Prime Minister Justin 
			Trudeau's Liberals, who backed the pipeline but has said the 
			Canada-U.S. relationship is “much bigger than any one project.” 
			 
			TransCanada said it will also take an after-tax write down of C$2.5 
			billion ($1.78 billion) to C$2.9 billion in the fourth quarter after 
			the permit denial. 
			 
			The project ran into opposition from environmental groups, and 
			blocking it became a litmus test of the green movement's ability to 
			hinder fossil fuel extraction in Canada's oil sands. 
			 
			"The suit is a reminder that we shouldn’t be signing new trade 
			agreements like the Trans Pacific Partnership that allow 
			corporations to sue governments that try and keep fossil fuels in 
			the ground," said Jason Kowalski, policy director of environmental 
			group 350.org which opposed the pipeline. 
			 
			TransCanada called the rejection "a symbolic gesture" aimed at 
			burnishing the Obama administration's leadership on climate change 
			in the eyes of the international community. 
			 
			TransCanada is also developing the Energy East pipeline, designed to 
			move 1.1 million barrels per day of western crude to Canada's East 
			Coast. That project too faces opposition from environmentalists 
			trying to halt industry expansion. 
			
			  
			TransCanada shares closed down 1.6 percent at $31.70 on the New York 
			Stock Exchange on Wednesday. After hours, the stock price stayed 
			steady after the legal actions were announced. 
			 
			($1 = 1.4075 Canadian dollars) 
			 
			(Additional reporting by Roberta Rampton in Washington, David 
			Ljunggren in Ottawa, Euan Rocha in Toronto, Anthony Lin in New York; 
			Writing by Amran Abocar; Editing by David Gregorio, Toni Reinhold) 
			[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] 
			Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  |