|  There are no talks scheduled for next week, and the American Federation of 
State, County and Municipal Employees Council 31 and the Rauner team are blaming 
each other for Friday’s events. 
 Lesley Nickus, Illinois News Network
 Lesley Nickus, Illinois News Network
 Gov. Bruce Rauner’s administration’s talks with AFSCME have broken down. Are 
they at an impasse?
 There’s also no agreement on whether the talks are at impasse, which AFSCME says 
the Rauner team declared.
 
 Rauner’s staff says it did not make such a declaration, but it is studying the 
question.
 
 On its own web page, AFSCME said the “governor’s representatives said they would 
refuse to participate in any further bargaining sessions and claimed that 
negotiations are at an impasse.”
 
 “We are shocked that the Rauner administration would walk away and refuse to 
continue negotiations,” wrote Council 31 Executive Director Roberta Lynch. “The 
governor’s rash action invites confrontation and chaos — it is not the path to a 
fair agreement.”
 The Republican governor’s staff says that’s not what happened.
 
 Instead, Rauner’s office says AFSCME negotiators turned down the 
administration’s offers for additional meetings next week.
 
 “In light of their answers today, we will now decide if the previously-agreed 
dispute resolution process should be considered,” the administration said in a 
statement.
 
 But that’s not accurate either, argued AFSCME spokesman Anders Lindall.
 
 “No bargaining dates were scheduled for next week,” he wrote on the Capitol Fax 
blog. “The administration asked very late if we could meet then but our 
committee was unavailable. Instead AFSCME offered to meet at any time in any of 
the following three weeks.”
 
 So, it’s not clear just yet whether the two sides are at impasse or if either 
side is going to ask the Illinois Labor Relations Board to make such a 
determination, which would be necessary under an agreement between the union and 
the governor’s office.
 
 A finding of impasse could trigger a direct confrontation between the Rauner 
administration and AFSCME and raise possibilities including an attempt by the 
state to impose new contract terms or, perhaps, even a lockout or strike.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
             AFSCME on Friday said it doesn’t believe the talks are at 
			impasse. “If they will not return to the table, our union will take legal 
			action,” Lynch wrote. “It is a violation of state labor law for a 
			party to declare impasse where none exists.”
 Rauner’s team avoided the word “impasse” but indicated the 
			administration is pondering its next move, including perhaps placing 
			the impasse question before the Labor Relations Board.
 
 “After a year of no meaningful progress, we must now evaluate the 
			benefit of future sessions given AFSCME’s intransigence,” the 
			administration said.
 
 Negotiators for the two sides began meeting in January, shortly 
			after Rauner was sworn in. AFSCME’s contract expired in June.
 
 There’s no love lost between the two groups. AFSCME has said 
			Rauner’s out to bust unions in Illinois, and Rauner has at times 
			called AFSCME “AF-scammie.”
 
 The two sides appear far apart on wages, insurance benefits, work 
			rules and other items.
 
 The Rauner administration points to its reaching deals with five 
			Teamster units and a dozen trade union locals representing about 
			5,300 state workers as proof it’s not trying to bust anyone, but 
			simply out to strike deals the the state can afford given its awful 
			financial condition.
   
			 
 The administration says those contracts included merit pay, bonus 
			pools, insurance options and cooperative agreements on areas such as 
			cost-savings and heightened efforts to hire and promote minorities 
			in state government.
 
 AFSCME said the governor’s team isn’t comparing like organizations 
			or responsibilities.
 
 For instance, it says the 4,700 Teamsters who have settled have an 
			independent health plan that members can rely on, whereas it and 
			other large unions still at the table represent some 40,000 
			employees, most of whom don’t have such a health option.
 
            
			Click here to respond to the editor about this article |