Dallas police chief defends use of robot
to kill gunman
Send a link to a friend
[July 11, 2016]
By Frank McGurty
(Reuters) - The chief of the Dallas Police
Department on Sunday vigorously defended the use of a bomb mounted on a
robot to kill a gunman who shot to death five officers during a march to
protest police violence against blacks.
In taking personal responsibility for approving the plan in the
aftermath of Thursday's shootings, Chief David Brown said he was
convinced that any hesitation in giving the go-ahead would have allowed
the gunman the chance to harm other officers.
"I approved it and would do it again if presented with same
circumstances," Brown told CNN, referring to the strategy of deploying a
bomb-equipped robot into a room where the suspect was holed up after his
shooting rampage.
That strategy revived the debate over the militarization of U.S. law
enforcement. Police were sharply criticized in 2014 after deploying
military-style guns and armor to quell protests against the killing of
an unarmed black teenager in Ferguson, Missouri.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4a49/a4a49599be0d47b44978b19c8b62a5713e26b806" alt=""
After two hours of fruitless negotiations with the Dallas gunman, Brown
asked senior officers to "use their imaginations" to devise a strategy
to disable the shooter, later identified as Micah Xavier Johnson, 25, a
former U.S. Army Reserve soldier who authorities said embraced black
nationalism.
"He seemed very much in control and very determined to hurt other
officers," said the police chief, who revealed that Johnson taunted
negotiators and asked them how many officers he had shot. "Without our
actions, he would have, he would have hurt more officers."
Brown said he stood by his decision but understood why questions have
been raised about the use of deadly force against the gunman, rather
than opting for a non-lethal method to disable him.
"I appreciate critics but they are not on the ground. And their lives
are not at risk," Brown said.
[to top of second column] |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7813/c7813b48651b6685b70ea9f6339e50aa0570bf61" alt=""
A sign is pictured at a makeshift memorial at Dallas Police
Headquarters following the multiple police shootings in Dallas,
Texas, U.S., July 9, 2016. REUTERS/Carlo Allegri
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e6fc/7e6fcd439ddf9c839e73739114681a00ccb4ab38" alt=""
While stopping short of directly criticizing the decision, New York
City Police Commissioner Bill Bratton on Sunday said a broad policy
discussion should take place before law enforcement resorts to such
tactics on a regular basis.
"It is something that needs to be done in a very public way,"
Bratton said on ABC's "This Week" program. "It is the first time
that type of action has been initiated here in the United States and
it deserves to be reviewed."
U.S. law enforcement has used remotely controlled devices before to
help stop suspects but not to kill anyone, experts say. Such devices
are often used by police to dispose of or detonate bombs without
risking human life.
A year ago, President Barack Obama banned police departments from
using certain military hardware and restricted the use of riot
shields and other equipment.
Obama said the ban would encourage trust-building between police and
the communities they serve.
(Reporting by Frank McGurty in New York; Editing by Andrew Roche and
Paul Simao)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d16cd/d16cd1712e060e1d5aa1455eaec80b6c78c1147b" alt="" |