Tribunal says China has no historic title
over South China Sea
Send a link to a friend
[July 12, 2016]
By Thomas Escritt and Ben Blanchard
AMSTERDAM/BEIJING (Reuters) - An
arbitration court ruled on Tuesday that China has no historic title over
the waters of the South China Sea and that it has breached the sovereign
rights of the Philippines with its actions there, infuriating a defiant
Beijing.
China, which has boycotted the hearings at the Permanent Court of
Arbitration in The Hague, vowed again to ignore the ruling and said its
armed forces would defend its sovereignty and maritime interests.
China's state-run Xinhua news agency said shortly before the ruling was
announced that a Chinese civilian aircraft successfully carried out
calibration tests on two new airports in the disputed Spratly Islands.
And China's Defence Ministry announced that a new guided missile
destroyer was formally commissioned at a naval base on the southern
island province of Hainan, which has responsibility for the South China
Sea.
"This award represents a devastating legal blow to China's
jurisdictional claims in the South China Sea," Ian Storey, of
Singapore's ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute, told Reuters.
"China will respond with fury, certainly in terms of rhetoric and
possibly through more aggressive actions at sea."
China claims most of the energy-rich waters through which about $5
trillion in ship-borne trade passes every year. Neighbors Brunei,
Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan and Vietnam also have claims.
Finding for the Philippines on a number of issues, the panel said there
was no legal basis for China to claim historic rights to resources
within its so-called nine-dash line, which covers much of the South
China Sea.
It said China had interfered with traditional Philippine fishing rights
at Scarborough Shoal, one of the hundreds of reefs and shoals dotting
the sea, and had breached the Philippines' sovereign rights by exploring
for oil and gas near the Reed Bank, another feature in the region.
None of China's reefs and holdings in the Spratly Islands entitled it to
a 200-mile exclusive economic zone, it added.
China's Foreign Ministry comprehensively rejected the ruling, saying its
people had more than 2,000 years of history in the South China Sea, that
its islands did have exclusive economic zones and that it had announced
to the world its "dotted line" map in 1948.
"China's territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests in
the South China Sea shall under no circumstances be affected by those
awards. China opposes and will never accept any claim or action based on
those awards," it said.
However, the ministry also repeated that China respected and upheld the
freedom of navigation and overflight and that China was ready to keep
resolving the disputes peacefully through talks with states directly
concerned.
China's Defence Ministry said in a bilingual Chinese and English
statement shortly before the ruling was made public that the armed
forces would "firmly safeguard national sovereignty, security and
maritime interests and rights, firmly uphold regional peace and
stability, and deal with all kinds of threats and challenges".
The ruling also said China had caused permanent harm to the coral reef
ecosystem in the Spratlys, charges China has always rejected.
The judges acknowledged China's refusal to participate, but said they
sought to take account of China's position on the basis of its
statements and diplomatic correspondence.
"The award is a complete and total victory for the Philippines ... a
victory for international law and international relations," said Paul
Reichler, lead lawyer for the Philippines.
Vietnam said it welcomed the ruling.
Taiwan, which had maintained the island it occupies, Itu Aba, is legally
the only island among the hundreds of reefs, shoals and atolls scattered
across the seas, said it did not accept the ruling, which had seriously
impaired Taiwan's territorial rights.
GROUND-BREAKING RULING
The ruling is significant as it is the first time that a legal challenge
has been brought in the dispute, which covers some of the world's most
promising oil and gas fields and vital fishing grounds.
[https://www.eia.gov/beta/international/regions-topics.cfm?RegionTopicID=SCS]
It reflects the shifting balance of power in the 3.5 million sq km sea,
where China has been expanding its presence by building artificial
islands and dispatching patrol boats that keep Philippine fishing
vessels away.
[to top of second column] |
Demonstrators display a part of a fishing boat with anti-China
protest signs during a rally by different activist groups over the
South China Sea disputes, outside the Chinese Consulate in Makati
City, Metro Manila, Philippines July 12, 2016. REUTERS/Erik De
Castrby
The United States and China often conduct military exercises in the
area and regularly accuse each other of militarizing the region.
"Our experts are studying the award with the care and thoroughness
that this significant arbitral outcome deserves," Philippine Foreign
Affairs Secretary Perfecto Yasay told a news conference, reading
from a prepared statement.
"We call on all those concerned to exercise restraint and sobriety.
The Philippines strongly affirms its respect for this milestone
decision as an important contribution to the ongoing efforts in
addressing disputes in the South China Sea."
Japan said the ruling was legally binding and final.
U.S. diplomatic, military and intelligence officers said China's
reaction to the court's decision would largely determine how other
claimants, as well as the United States, responded.
If, for example, China accelerated or escalated its military
activities in the disputed area, the U.S. and other nations would
have little choice but to respond with new and possibly enlarged and
multinational maritime freedom of navigation and aerial missions,
the U.S. officials said, speaking on the condition of anonymity.
Contingency planning for such exercises was already completed or was
in its final stages, said one of the officials, who quickly added:
"We hope it doesn't come to that."
OIL PRICES JUMP
Oil prices jumped following the findings from The Hague, with
international Brent crude futures up over a dollar, or more than 2
percent, to $47.29 per barrel at 0932 GMT.
The deep waters of the South China Basin between the Spratly and
also-disputed Paracel Islands are the most direct shipping lane
between northeast Asia's industrial hubs of China, Japan and South
Korea and Europe and the Middle East.
The case, brought by the Philippines in 2013, hinged on the legal
status of reefs, rocks and artificial islands in the Scarborough
Shoal and Spratly Island group.
Manila's 15-point case asked the tribunal to rule on the status of
the nine-dash line, a boundary that is the basis for its 69-year-old
claim to roughly 85 percent of the South China Sea.
The court has no power of enforcement, but a victory for the
Philippines could spur Taiwan, Vietnam, Malaysia and Brunei to file
similar cases.
Ahead of the ruling, around 100 members of a Philippine nationalist
group demonstrated outside the Chinese consulate in Manila on
Tuesday, calling on Beijing to accept the decision and leave the
Scarborough Shoal, a popular fishing zone off limits to Filipinos
since 2012.
In China, social media users reacted with outrage at the ruling.
"It was ours in the past, is now and will remain so in the future,"
wrote one user on microblogging site Weibo. "Those who encroach on
our China's territory will die no matter how far away they are."
Spreading fast on social media in the Philippines was the use of the
term "Chexit" - the public's desire for Chinese vessels to leave the
waters.
(Additional reporting by Enrico Dela Cruz and Martin Petty in
Manila, Megha Rajagopalan in Beijing, Tim Kelly in Tokyo, John
Walcott in Washington, and Greg Torode in Hong Kong.; Editing by
Lincoln Feast and Nick Macfie)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|