Massachusetts attorney general bans
'copycat' assault weapons
Send a link to a friend
[July 21, 2016]
(Reuters) - Massachusetts will ban
the sale of "copycat" assault-style weapons similar to those
increasingly used in mass shootings, state Attorney General Maura Healey
said on Wednesday.
The move takes effect immediately and is part of stepped-up enforcement
of Massachusetts' ban on military-style assault weapons, she said in a
statement.
"The gun industry has openly defied our laws here in Massachusetts for
nearly two decades. That ends today," said Healey, a Democrat.
She said assault rifles had become the weapon of choice in mass
shootings. They have been used in massacres in Orlando, Florida; San
Bernardino, California; Newtown, Connecticut; and Aurora, Colorado.
Her enforcement notice clarifies what constitutes a “copy” or
“duplicate” weapon under the assault weapons ban. Copies or duplicates
of banned assault rifles, including copies of the Colt AR-15 and the
Kalashnikov AK-47, are prohibited in the state.
Despite the law, an estimated 10,000 "copycat" assault weapons were sold
in Massachusetts last year, the statement said.
Healey's statement said gun manufacturers made versions with minor
tweaks to various parts of the weapon. Copycat guns are sold, for
example, without a flash suppressor or with a fixed instead of folding
stock.
Under Healey's notice, a weapon is a copy or duplicate if its internal
operating system is largely the same as those of a specifically banned
weapon. The gun also is considered a copy or duplicate if key parts are
interchangeable with those of a banned weapon.
[to top of second column] |
Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey speaks about gun
violence prevention at the White House in Washington, U.S., May 24,
2016. REUTERS/James Lawler Duggan
Gun dealers with existing stock will have to sell them to dealers
out of state.
The Gun Owners' Action League of Massachusetts, a gun rights
advocacy group, criticized Healey's move in a statement, saying it
was unconstitutional and had been done without due process. The
group is weighing possible courses of action.
"One thing is certain is that this new interpretation is purely a
political stunt and has nothing to do with public safety or law,"
said Jim Wallace, the group's executive director.
(Reporting by Ian Simpson; Editing by David Gregorio)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|