Uber, Lyft set to defend
driver settlements in court
Send a link to a friend
[June 02, 2016]
By Heather Somerville and Dan Levine
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Uber and Lyft
on Thursday will attempt to persuade separate U.S. judges to approve
class action settlements which keep drivers classified as
independent contractors instead of employees.
The ride-hailing companies are seeking to resolve lawsuits by
drivers who contend they should be deemed employees and therefore
entitled to reimbursement for expenses, including gasoline and
vehicle maintenance. Drivers currently pay those costs themselves.
A ruling that these workers are employees would affect the profits
and valuations at so-called on-demand technology companies,
including cleaning service Handy and delivery company Postmates.
Uber agreed to settle its lawsuit for up to $100 million, plus other
benefits including help forming a drivers' association. Attorneys
for drivers argue that the deal is fair, because the lawsuit faced
significant risks and drivers could have wound up with nothing if
the case moved forward.
However, the settlement has drawn objections from numerous drivers
who say it shortchanged them, particularly because the total
potential damages in the case reached $852 million.
[to top of second column] |
The deal is subject to approval by U.S. District Judge Edward Chen in San
Francisco.
A $12.25 million agreement reached by Lyft has already been rejected by U.S.
District Judge Vince Chhabria, who said it was too small. The company and
attorneys of drivers have renegotiated, and are proposing a $27 million deal.
Attorneys representing the Teamsters union had objected to the previous Lyft
deal because it left drivers as independent contractors. However, Chhabria said
he was concerned with the settlement amount, not the fact that the deal did not
classify drivers as employees.
(Reporting by Heather Somerville and Dan Levine; Editing by Richard Chang)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |