Wolf dens, not lone wolves, the norm in
U.S. Islamic State plots
Send a link to a friend
[June 14, 2016]
By Joseph Ax
NEW YORK (Reuters) - If Omar Mateen acted
alone in plotting the massacre of 49 people at Orlando's Pulse gay
nightclub, he would be the exception rather than the rule in U.S. cases
involving suspected Islamic State supporters.
Sunday's worst mass shooting in modern U.S. history prompted
renewed warnings from officials of "lone wolf" attackers, a term
that commonly invokes images of isolated individuals, radicalized
online by violent propaganda and plotting alone.
But a Reuters review of the approximately 90 Islamic State court
cases brought by the Department of Justice since 2014 found that
three-quarters of those charged were alleged to be part of a group
of anywhere from two to more than 10 co-conspirators who met in
person to discuss their plans.
Even in those cases that did not involve in-person meetings,
defendants were almost always in contact with other sympathizers,
whether via text message, email or networking websites, according to
court documents. Fewer than 10 cases involved someone accused of
acting entirely alone.
The "lone wolf" image obscures the extent to which individuals
become radicalized through personal association with like-minded
people, in what might be termed "wolf dens," experts on
radicalization and counter-terrorism say.
"We focus so much on the online stuff that we're missing that
there's a very human connection going on here," said Karen
Greenberg, who runs the Center on National Security at Fordham
University in New York.
U.S. authorities on Monday were investigating whether Mateen -- who
pledged allegiance to Islamic State during the attack -- had any
help, but officials stressed they believed there were no other
attackers.
FBI director James Comey said his exact motives remain unclear, but
that there were strong indications he was inspired by foreign
terrorist groups and that authorities were "highly confident" he was
radicalized in part over the Internet.
INFILTRATING GROUPS
Law enforcement efforts to combat homegrown extremism have started
to focus more on group dynamics. In a December speech at a
counterterrorism conference in New York, Comey said investigators
need family and friends to help them identify potentially
radicalized individuals who may not have a visible online presence.
"If they go out and interact with small groups of people, who sees
them?" he said. "Community members."
In February, the FBI launched a website to educate teenagers about
the dangers of extremism and help parents and community leaders
decide when to intervene and when to report troubling behavior.
The Justice Department has secured convictions in around half the 90
Islamic State-linked cases. Other cases are ongoing, with some of
the charges unproven in court and disputed by defendants.
The relationships between accused co-conspirators range from casual
acquaintances to lifelong friends, from married couples to cousins
and from roommates to college buddies.
In some cases, the group included several defendants from the same
community, such as the sprawling investigation in Minnesota in which
10 Somali-Americans were charged with plotting to aid Islamic State.
Three were convicted at trial this month, while six others pleaded
guilty in the case.
In others, such as the married couple responsible for killing 14
people in December in San Bernardino, California, the relationship
was far more intimate.
In an increasingly frequent occurrence, the defendant was
unwittingly working with an FBI informant posing as a
co-conspirator, as federal authorities rely more on human
intelligence and less on the comparatively low-hanging fruit of
social media to identify potential attackers.
Face-to-face interactions can accelerate extremist viewpoints,
turning the group to violence, experts said. And it can draw in
others who might otherwise not have been susceptible to the lure of
jihadism.
"The true lone wolf is usually psychotic, and very few jihadists are
truly psychotic," said Jytte Klausen, a professor at Brandeis
University who specializes in radicalization.
[to top of second column] |
An undated photo from a social media account of Omar Mateen, who
Orlando Police have identified as the suspect in the mass shooting
at a gay nighclub in Orlando, Florida, U.S., June 12, 2016. Omar
Mateen via Myspace/Handout via REUTERS
Online propaganda is merely stoking the fire rather than igniting
it, some experts said.
"Imagine if Match.com were set up in such a way that the people
could never meet," said Max Abrahms, a professor at Northeastern
University who has studied extremist groups. "Clearly there's no
replacement for actual socialization in person."
"PREYING" ON INSECURITIES
One of the cases showing the crucial role of group dynamics involves
a cluster of six defendants in the New York area.
Nader Saadeh and his friend, a New York City college student named
Munther Omar Saleh, had become convinced in 2013 that the end of the
world was near, according to prosecutors.
The two 20-year-olds decided to create a "small army" of friends,
prosecutors said, and eventually recruited four others, including
21-year-old student Samuel Topaz and a 16-year-old friend of Saleh's
named Imran Rabbani.
The men spent months discussing plans to join Islamic State in Syria
or to launch a bomb attack on U.S. soil, according to investigators.
Authorities first became aware of the group when Topaz's mother
called the FBI in early 2015 after becoming increasingly concerned
about his behavior.
Topaz, raised by a Catholic mother from the Dominican Republic and a
Jewish father from Israel, had dropped out of college and begun
spending most of his time with two classmates, Saadeh and his older
brother, Alaa. Topaz converted to Islam and had begun talking about
traveling overseas, his mother told the FBI, according to court
documents.
The Saadeh brothers were trying to recruit Topaz by "preying" on his
insecurities, she said.
In May this year, Alaa Saadeh was sentenced to 15 years in prison
after pleading guilty in October to conspiring to provide material
support to Islamic State. His brother, Topaz and Rabbani also
pleaded guilty and are awaiting sentencing.
Saleh, who is accused of plotting to set off a homemade bomb in New
York, was arrested in June 2015 when he and Rabbani attacked a law
enforcement surveillance vehicle that had been following them. Saleh
and the other defendant, Fareed Mumuni, have pleaded not guilty.
At his sentencing, Alaa Saadeh told the judge he had acted in part
out of love for his younger brother in the absence of their deported
parents.
"I could have helped him," he said. "I could have done a lot more."
(Reporting by Joseph Ax; Additional reporting by Kristina Cooke;
editing by Stuart Grudgings.)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |