Trump fights release of video testimony
in fraud case
Send a link to a friend
[June 14, 2016]
By Karen Freifeld
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Lawyers for
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump on Monday filed court
papers opposing the release of video showing him being questioned under
oath about his Trump University series of real estate seminars.
They argued that making public the videos, for which written
transcripts are already available, would prejudice Trump's case. The
video is "unnecessary, irrelevant and unjustified," lawyers for
Trump wrote in court papers filed in federal court in San Diego.
In legal proceedings, evidence is considered prejudicial if it may
interfere with a judge or jury's objective consideration of the
facts. Such evidence can still be presented if it is considered
highly relevant to the case.
The Republican candidate has already claimed the federal judge
overseeing the case is biased against him because of the judge's
Mexican heritage.
Trump may also have concerns about the impact the videos could have
outside the courtroom. On Friday, CNN, CBS, the New York Times, and
other media outlets asked for the complete deposition transcripts
and videotapes to be made available. If released, the videos could
provide fodder for campaign commercials against Trump.
In lawsuits in California and New York, Trump has been accused of
bilking students who paid as much as $35,000 for an opportunity to
learn the businessman's real estate investment strategies. Former
Trump University students suing the billionaire claim that they
learned little and that their instructors, supposedly hand-picked by
Trump, had few qualifications.
During deposition, Trump has admitted that he did not select
instructors. His lawyers have argued the "hand-picked" claim
amounted to mere sales "puffery" rather than fraud.
[to top of second column] |
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump waves as he walks
offstage after delivering a campaign speech about national security
in Manchester, New Hampshire, U.S. June 13, 2016 in response to the
mass shooting at Orlando's Pulse nightclub. REUTERS/Brian Snyder
In court papers arguing for the videos' release, lawyers for the
students argued the images presented nuances not available in the
transcripts. "Trump's tone, facial expressions, gestures and body
language... speak volumes to... Trump's complete and utter
unfamiliarity with the instructors and 'instruction' that
student-victims received," they said.
Trump has said the claims over Trump University are baseless and
that students highly rated the programs.
The case is Art Cohen v Donald J. Trump, 13-cv-2519, U.S. District
Court, Southern District of California.
(Reporting By Karen Freifeld; Editing by Anthony Lin and David
Gregorio)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|