Senate rejects gun-control measures after
Orlando shooting
Send a link to a friend
[June 21, 2016]
By Richard Cowan and John Whitesides
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate on
Monday rejected four measures restricting gun sales after last week's
massacre in an Orlando nightclub, dealing a bitter setback to advocates
who have failed to get even modest gun curbs through Congress despite
repeated mass shootings.
A group of senators was still hoping to forge a compromise for
later in the week aimed at keeping firearms away from people on
terrorism watch lists, although that effort faced an uphill battle
with critics in both parties skeptical about its chances.
Last week's massacre, the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S.
history, had intensified pressure on lawmakers, who moved swiftly to
take the issue to the Senate floor. But the gun-control measures
lost in largely party-line votes that showed the lingering political
power in Congress of gun rights defenders and the National Rifle
Association.
Republicans and their allies in the NRA gun lobby said the
Democratic bills were too restrictive and trampled on the
constitutional right to bear arms. Democrats attacked the
Republicans' two proposals as too weak and accused them of being in
the thrall of the NRA.
"What am I going to tell the community of Orlando?" asked Democratic
Senator Bill Nelson of Florida after the votes. "Sadly, what I’m
going to tell them is the NRA won again."
Chris Cox, executive director of the National Rifle Association
Institute for Legislative Action, attacked the Democrats' amendments
and thanked Republicans for rejecting them. "Today, the American
people witnessed an embarrassing display in the United States," he
said.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, said
the Democratic measures were ineffective and Republican senators
"are pursuing real solutions that can help keep Americans safer from
the threat of terrorism."
As the parties remain largely locked in their positions, polls show
Americans are increasingly in favor of more restrictions on guns in
a country with more than 310 million weapons, about one for every
citizen.
The issue is already a prominent one for voters in November
elections. Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary
Clinton supports new gun restrictions, while Republican Donald Trump
expressed a willingness to talk to the NRA about the issue.
After the votes, Clinton issued a one-word statement: "Enough." It
was followed by the names and ages of the dead in Orlando.
Gun control efforts failed after mass shootings at an elementary
school in Newtown, Connecticut, in 2012 and a conference center in
San Bernardino, California, in 2015. But some senators see
resistance to gun restrictions softening as national security looms
larger in the debate.
The Orlando gunman, Omar Mateen, pledged allegiance to the militant
group Islamic State as he killed 49 people in a gay nightclub.
"This country is under attack ... it's not a plane or an explosive
device, it's an assault weapon," said Connecticut Senator Chris
Murphy, a Democrat who led a 15-hour filibuster last week to draw
attention to the effort to restrict guns.
'SHAME ON EVERY SINGLE SENATOR'
Murphy walked off the floor after the Senate votes and embraced
Erica Smegielski, the daughter of Dawn Hochsprung, a Sandy Hook
principal killed during the Newtown shooting.
[to top of second column] |
People take part in a vigil for the Pulse night club victims as the
Lake Enola fountain is lit in rainbow colors following last week's
shooting in Orlando, Florida, U.S., June 19, 2016. REUTERS/Carlo
Allegri
"He said, the good thing about me and you is we’re young, we’ll be
at this a long time," said Smegielski, 30.
A Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted last week found that 71 percent of
Americans favor at least moderate regulations and restrictions on
gun sales. That compared with 60 percent in late 2013 and late 2014.
Senior Senate aides left open the possibility of other votes later
in the week on unspecified gun control proposals. Some Republicans
pinned hopes on a proposal by Senator Susan Collins, a Maine
Republican, which was not one of the four bills being considered on
Monday.
Collins' plan would restrict gun purchases to a narrow group of
suspects, including those on a "no-fly" list or a "selectee" list of
people who require additional screening at airports..
But Democratic aides said people credibly suspected of involvement
in terrorism would not be covered by the weapons ban under Collins'
bill, and a Republican aide indicated it would not do enough to
protect the constitutional rights of gun buyers.
Even if the Senate approved a gun compromise, it would also have to
be passed by the more conservative, Republican-majority House of
Representatives. House Republican leadership aides did not comment
on the possibility that any bills proposing gun restrictions would
be considered on the House floor this week.
On Monday, all four of the measures to expand background checks on
gun buyers and curb gun sales to those on terrorism watch lists -
two put forth by Democrats and two by Republicans - fell short of
the 60 votes needed for passage in the 100-member chamber.
Gun-control advocates expressed disappointment after the vote and
vowed to take revenge on lawmakers at the ballot box in November.
"Shame on every single senator who voted against these life-saving
amendments and protected the rights of terrorists and other
dangerous people to buy guns," said Dan Gross, president of the
Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. "The Brady Campaign will
expose these politicians for who they really are and call out their
failure to disarm hate in America."
(Additional reporting by Amanda Becker and Emily Stephenson; Writing
by John Whitesides; Editing by Alistair Bell and Mary Milliken)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |