Eight justices will hear the case, not the usual nine. The Feb. 13
death of conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, who opposed abortion
and backed restrictions on it, means the court no longer has five
conservatives who might support more restrictive abortion
regulations nationwide.
The court potentially could split 4-4, with its four liberal
justices opposing the abortion restrictions and its four
conservatives backing the regulations, an action that would let
stand a lower-court ruling that affirmed the Texas law but would not
set a nationwide legal precedent.
The state contends the Republican-backed 2013 law protects women's
health. The abortion providers who have challenged it assert that it
is aimed at shutting down their clinics.
The court has not ruled in an abortion case since 2007. The Texas
case represents a high-stakes constitutional test for a strategic
shift that abortion opponents have taken in recent years: to apply
restrictive regulations to abortion doctors and facilities rather
than try to ban the procedure outright.
Activists on both sides of the issue are planning demonstrations
outside the courthouse.
There is a chance that conservative Justice Anthony Kennedy, who
often casts the deciding vote in close cases, could join the
liberals for a majority invalidating the law, or parts of it.
Kennedy in past cases has supported a fundamental right to abortion
but has endorsed restrictions including bans on a late-term abortion
procedure.
The Texas law requires abortion doctors to have "admitting
privileges" at a hospital within 30 miles (48 km) of the clinic so
they can treat patients needing surgery or other critical care.
[to top of second column] |
Abortion providers say the provision already has prompted clinics to
close because this formal hospital affiliation is difficult for
clinic doctors to obtain.
The abortion providers also are challenging provisions in the law,
not yet in effect, that mandate that clinics have costly,
hospital-grade facilities.
The Supreme Court found a constitutional right to end a pregnancy in
the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade case. That decision was affirmed in
1992, as the justices ruled that any regulation must not impose an
"undue burden" on women seeking an abortion.
At issue in Wednesday's case is whether the Texas requirements
violate that principle by putting a "substantial obstacle" in the
path of a woman before a fetus becomes viable.
A ruling is due by the end of June.
(Editing by Will Dunham)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|