The big challenge is how to introduce the latest technological
wizardry as frequently as possible without interfering with the
economics of selling cars: earning back the cash spent on expensive
tooling, production and distribution.
The problem is neatly illustrated by the rapid release of ever more
advanced mobile phones, compared with a turnaround of about seven
years for new car models.
Narrowing that gap is crucial, given how mobile phones and cars have
become increasingly integrated, not to mention the advances in
computer software and processing power that will be key to making
self-driving cars a commercial success.
The new Mercedes-Benz E-Class, for example, can activate
accident-avoidance braking systems far earlier than any other
Mercedes model, thanks to a doubling of the performance of radars,
the stereo camera and processing power.
Tesla, a loss-making producer of premium electric cars, has set the
pace, adapting the strategy of improving its products as soon as is
possible, using software updates and by making changes to the
hardware.
Yet executives at the Geneva show say car product cycles will not
tighten much below six years.
"I do not see a reduction in the product cycle for the car," said
Klaus Froehlich, BMW board member responsible for research and
development.
Volvo Chief Executive Hakan Samuelsson explained: "It's about how
effectively you use capital. Shortening the product cycle too much
means you won't earn back the money and you will not be profitable."
'CAUTIOUS'
For example, the cost of a high-end stamping press for making body
panels costs about 40 million euros ($43.38 million). That
investment needs to be recovered over many months and years, even
for manufacturers of premium cars.
"We are very cautious about whether we should accelerate the life
cycle of a vehicle. Seven years is an established time frame," said
Daimler board member Thomas Weber, who is responsible for group
research and Mercedes-Benz cars development.
"Time to market should be as short as possible, but even here many
companies make mistakes. Making a product perfect takes time."
Mercedes, BMW and others are seeking to shorten the time it takes to
develop a car and introduce interchangeable parts that can be
updated in a "product refresh" while sticking to the seven-year
product cycle.
[to top of second column] |
A key reason to keep the seven-year cycle is to avoid introducing
next-generation products before customers have had time to pay for
existing cars.
Leasing contracts generally last 36 months, with monthly payments
based on the assumed resale value of the vehicle. Introducing a new
model too soon could hit resale values, potentially raising leasing
rates for buyers of previous-generation vehicles.
Analysts BNP Paribas said that German carmakers' leasing contract
volumes have doubled since 2007 to about 80 billion euros at the end
of last year, with BMW’s leasing contracts representing more than
half of its market capitalization.
TWIN-TRACK APPROACH
To help keep their products up to date, Mercedes and BMW are now
focusing on shortening the software product cycle while keeping
expensive components on the market for six to seven years.
“We see different potential for optimizing hardware and software.
Hardware, steel, the engine, the crank case, the transmission should
have long life cycles, while software will be updated in a more
dynamic, frequent manner. And processors are ordered with potential
upgrades in mind during the life cycle of the vehicle," Daimler's
Weber said.
Effectively, it's a case of wheels within wheels.
"We are moving away from a trend to build a brand new car from
scratch every seven years. Carmakers are now working with modular
systems, with some components in use over two generations of
vehicle," said Wolfgang Bernhart, a partner at consultancy Roland
Berger.
Philippe Klein, of Nissan's global product planning operation, said:
"The name of the game is how can you refresh your product without
having to reinvest everything. The industry is capital intensive;
you need to amortise the investment over time."
(Editing by David Goodman)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|