| 
            
			 By the end of this year, the fund which invests income from Norway's 
			oil and gas production could add the first companies to its 
			blacklist for emitting too much climate changing gas, said the 
			chairman of its independent ethics panel, Johan H. Andresen. 
			 
			The ethics panel will also look into allegations of human rights 
			abuses in Qatar's building sector, Malaysia's electronics goods 
			industry, and textile factories in some Asian countries, Andresen 
			told Reuters. 
			 
			The fund is the world's biggest sovereign wealth fund, owning 1.3 
			percent of all listed company equity on earth. As of the end of last 
			year it owned shares in 9,050 firms worldwide. 
			 
			It is forbidden by law from investing in firms that produce nuclear 
			weapons or anti-personnel landmines, or are involved in serious and 
			systematic human rights violations, among other ethical criteria. 
			 
			Norway's parliament has set a new mandate from this year to restrict 
			investment in companies that emit excessive climate changing gases. 
			Andresen said his panel was still looking into the criteria for such 
			judgments but its first recommendations on climate criteria could 
			come by the end of the year. 
			  
			Some 66 companies have so far been excluded from the wealth fund on 
			ethics grounds, and two are under observation, including, since 
			January, Brazil's state oil company Petrobras <PETR4.SA>, under 
			scrutiny for alleged corruption. 
			 
			"Most of the corruption cases come from the industry studies within 
			defense, telecoms and energy. Those three (sectors) seem to keep us 
			very busy," Andresen, the council's chairman, said in an interview. 
			"We will of course look into other companies, should we be made 
			aware of them." 
			 
			The Council on Ethics makes recommendations to the central bank on 
			firms which may be in breach of the fund's ethics guidelines. It is 
			now examining 14 corruption cases, including Petrobras. 
			 
			Based on the council's recommendations, the central bank board 
			instructs the fund's management whether to exclude companies from 
			the fund. The board can also put firms under observation to allow 
			them to fix the problem. A key factor is the risk that an ethics 
			breach will be repeated in future. 
			 
			The risk of corruption increases in the energy, defense and telecoms 
			sectors as they more often involve large contracts between parties 
			that can withhold information based on internal national security 
			directives, Andresen said. 
			 
			"We were especially surprised with what we found in the arms 
			industry. It seems that the absence of corruption was the exception 
			and not the norm," said the 54-year-old Norwegian investor, owner of 
			private investment vehicle Ferd. 
			 
			Andresen declined to comment specifically on Petrobras, but speaking 
			generally, he said: "Companies should aspire to be far better ... 
			They should not try to guess what is the least amount of good 
			behavior that is expected." 
			 
			Across all sectors, he expected the number and frequency of 
			recommendations to the central bank's board to increase as the 
			council concludes the different sector studies it has begun. 
			 
			"We did recommend one company for exclusion last week, and there are 
			others that we are working on right now. Some of these companies are 
			quite large, so the (central) bank may decide to undertake some type 
			of ownership interaction," he said. 
			
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
            
			  
			TEXTILE, CONSTRUCTION AND CLIMATE CHANGE 
			 
			Asked about the apparent irony in looking at climate change for a 
			fund that earns nearly all its wealth from Norway's oil and gas 
			industry, Andresen said: "We don't get involved in politics and 
			therefore we don't question the criteria. Whichever criteria the 
			politicians give us, we will use." 
			 
			Andresen said the council would look at "a broad set of industries" 
			including the oil and gas sector over climate change, and had not 
			yet concluded which factors to analyze to determine what is 
			acceptable. 
			 
			"I don't think there is a reason to avoid looking at oil and gas 
			companies. But they are not going to be the only ones by far," he 
			said, speaking at the council's office in central Oslo. 
			 
			"We think that there might be some exclusions towards the end of the 
			year within the climate criterion." 
			 
			Next month the council will receive a first report on the 
			construction industry in Qatar. Construction companies working in 
			neighboring countries will be under review too, he said. 
			Also under scrutiny will be electronics goods manufacturers in 
			Malaysia. 
			 
			The council will look at workers rights in the Indian and 
			Bangladeshi textile industries, after looking at Cambodia and 
			Vietnam last year. 
			 
			"In earlier studies of textile production facilities, we have been 
			confronted with forced overtime, loss of bonus when legally sick, 
			possible child labor, safety issues and the integrity of the 
			construction of the (plant) building," he said. 
			 
			Another target will be the environmental damage made by the chemical 
			industry. The council is looking at "less than ten" companies in 
			this field, he said. 
			  
			
			  
			 
			 
			The council, although independent, is collaborating closely with the 
			fund, which has its own ethical targets, such as children's rights, 
			human rights and water management. They are working together on the 
			textile industry. 
			 
			"They are focusing on the buyers' side, the big companies within the 
			fund, while we engage with the smaller companies where the potential 
			breach is happening on the ground," he said. 
			 
			(Editing by Peter Graff) 
			[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  |