India's
codeine cough syrup ban hits Pfizer, Abbott units
Send a link to a friend
[March 14, 2016]
By Zeba Siddiqui and Aditya Kalra
MUMBAI/NEW DELHI (Reuters) - Pfizer Inc
and Abbott Laboratories on Monday said they would comply with a ban on a
popular cough syrup in India after it was added to a local list of
prohibited drugs, sending shares in the U.S. firms' Indian subsidiaries
tumbling.
|
Pfizer's Corex-brand syrup and Abbott's identical Phensedyl contain
the narcotic codeine. That brought them to the attention of
authorities combating addiction and smuggling, who had been
privately pressuring the drugmakers to better police supply chains,
Reuters reported last year.
"We are happy that this will end the misuse of the medicine," said
Akun Sabharwal, drugs controller for the southern state of Telangana,
that last year detected an "illegal diversion" of Phensedyl worth
about $8.5 million.
Shares of Pfizer Ltd <PFIZ.NS> fell as much as 8 percent after the
drugmaker said it stopped selling its version of the medicine.
Shares of Abbott India Ltd <ABOT.NS> fell as much as 3 percent after
the firm said it would comply with the ban.
INDUSTRY SALES HIT
The medicine - a combination of chlorpheniramine maleate and codeine
syrup - was among 344 fixed-dose combination drugs that Indian
regulators banned at the weekend after a panel of experts found they
lacked "therapeutic justification".
Market researcher AIOCD AWACS estimated the total ban could cut
sales in the local pharmaceutical industry by up to $522 million,
with Pfizer and Abbott among the worst hit.
Pfizer said Corex sales totaled about $26 million in the nine months
through December. Abbott's Phensedyl commands around a third of the
local cough syrup market and makes up over 3 percent of the
company's $1 billion in Indian revenue.
Pfizer said of the ban that it was "exploring all possible options."
[to top of second column] |
OPPI, a lobby group for multinational drugmakers, said regulators
had used "a very broad brush" when imposing the ban. The Indian
Pharmaceutical Alliance, which represents Indian drugmakers, said
review process was not transparent.
Health ministry bureaucrat K.L. Sharma told Reuters on Monday that
he disagreed, saying, "We are not prepared to tolerate anything that
will affect patients."
COURT BATTLE
The sale of combination drugs requires the approval of central
government. However, the 344 listed at the weekend entered the
market based only on local approval.
Regulators have made intermittent efforts to prevent drugs reaching
the market without central government clearance. They issued an
order in 2007 requiring states to recall about 300 combination
drugs. Drugmakers challenged the order in court, which put it on
hold. (http://reut.rs/1J9azFo)
In 2014, regulators set up a review of combination drugs that had
not received central government approval. Regulators have assessed
over 6,000 such drugs and asked makers to prove their safety and
efficacy.
While it has banned 344, the review process is ongoing, the health
ministry's Sharma said.
(Reporting by Zeba Siddiqui in MUMBAI and Aditya Kalra in NEW DELHI;
Editing by Paritosh Bansal and Christopher Cushing)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|