Plaintiffs
face critical legal tests in GM ignition-switch cases
Send a link to a friend
[March 14, 2016]
By Jessica Dye
NEW YORK (Reuters) - People suing General
Motors Co <GM.N> over a faulty ignition switch will get two chances in a
Manhattan court this week to argue that the U.S. automaker should be
held accountable for injuries, deaths and lost vehicle value.
|
Jury selection starts on Monday in the second trial involving a
car accident allegedly caused by the switch. The defect, which some
GM employees knew about for years, prompted the recall of 2.6
million vehicles in 2014 and has been linked to nearly 400 serious
injuries and deaths.
A first trial ended abruptly in January following allegations that
the plaintiff gave misleading testimony.
On Tuesday, in the same courthouse, plaintiffs suing over lost
vehicle value and accidents that occurred before GM's 2009
bankruptcy will ask the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reverse
unfavorable decisions from a bankruptcy court last year. They say
the rulings could impact many of their claims under a sale agreement
that largely freed "New GM" from burdensome liabilities that predate
the bankruptcy.
The proceedings could affect claims worth potentially billions of
dollars over the defective switch, which can slip out of place,
causing engine stalls and cutting power to air bags, brakes and
steering systems.
While GM has already paid $2 billion in settlements and penalties
over the defect, it still faces hundreds of injury and death
lawsuits. To help gauge those cases’ value, a series of test trials
has been set to determine how juries view the evidence. That
information is used in settlement talks.
As the first trial never reached a verdict, the one starting on
Monday may be the first time a jury weighs in on whether GM is
liable for its years-long failure to conduct a recall. A GM
spokesman said the company will argue that the crash at issue was
not caused by the switch.
[to top of second column] |
At the 2nd Circuit, plaintiffs will argue that GM should face their
claims because the company's deception deprived them of a chance to
participate in the bankruptcy proceedings.
A lawyer for the plaintiffs, Steve Berman, said that had the U.S.
government known about the defect during GM's bankruptcy, "The cars
would have been recalled then, or the deal modified."
Plaintiffs’ lawyers have estimated the value of the economic-loss
claims to be as high as $10 billion. But they acknowledge they could
face steep hurdles to recovering anything if the 2nd Circuit does
not overturn the earlier decisions.
(Reporting by Jessica Dye; Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi and Dan
Grebler)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|