| 
			 The report, prepared by the Sustainable Development Solutions 
			Network (SDSN) and the Earth Institute at Columbia University, 
			showed Syria, Afghanistan and eight sub-Saharan countries as the 10 
			least happy places on earth to live. 
 The top 10 this year were Denmark, Switzerland, Iceland, Norway, 
			Finland, Canada, Netherlands, New Zealand, Australia, and Sweden. 
			Denmark was in third place last year, behind Switzerland and 
			Iceland.
 
 The bottom 10 were Madagascar, Tanzania, Liberia, Guinea, Rwanda, 
			Benin, Afghanistan, Togo, Syria and Burundi.
 
 The United States came in at 13, the United Kingdom at 23, France at 
			32, and Italy at 50.
 
 "There is a very strong message for my country, the United States, 
			which is very rich, has gotten a lot richer over the last 50 years, 
			but has gotten no happier," said Professor Jeffrey Sachs, head of 
			the SDSN and special advisor to U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon.
 
			
			 While the differences between countries where people are happy and 
			those where they are not could be scientifically measured, "we can 
			understand why and do something about it," Sachs, one of the 
			report's authors, told Reuters in an interview in Rome.
 "The message for the United States is clear. For a society that just 
			chases money, we are chasing the wrong things. Our social fabric is 
			deteriorating, social trust is deteriorating, faith in government is 
			deteriorating," he said.
 
 Aiming to "survey the scientific underpinnings of measuring and 
			understanding subjective well-being," the report, now in its fourth 
			edition, ranks 157 countries by happiness levels using factors such 
			as per capita gross domestic product (GDP) and healthy years of life 
			expectancy.
 
 It also rates "having someone to count on in times of trouble" and 
			freedom from corruption in government and business.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
			"When countries single-mindedly pursue individual objectives, such 
			as economic development to the neglect of social and environmental 
			objectives, the results can be highly adverse for human wellbeing, 
			even dangerous for survival," it said.
 "Many countries in recent years have achieved economic growth at the 
			cost of sharply rising inequality, entrenched social exclusion, and 
			grave damage to the natural environment."
 
 YARDSTICK FOR HAPPINESS
 
 The first report was issued in 2012 to support a U.N. meeting on 
			happiness and well-being. Five countries - Bhutan, Ecuador, 
			Scotland, United Arab Emirates and Venezuela - now have appointed 
			Ministers of Happiness charged with promoting it as a goal of public 
			policy.
 
 The 2016 survey showed that three countries in particular, Ireland, 
			Iceland and Japan, were able to maintain their happiness levels 
			despite external shocks such as the post-2007 economic crisis and 
			the 2011 earthquake because of social support and solidarity.
 
 Sachs pointed to Costa Rica, which came in 14th and ahead of many 
			wealthier countries, as an example of a healthy, happy society 
			although it is not an economic powerhouse.
 
 (Reporting by Philip Pullella; Editing by Ruth Pitchford)
 
			[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			 |