| 
		
		
		 Hulk 
		Hogan sex-tape lawsuit against Gawker due to go to Florida jury 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		[March 18, 2016] 
		By Jared Leone
 ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. (Reuters) - Celebrity 
		wrestler Hulk Hogan's privacy invasion suit against the Gawker website 
		over a sex tape of him posted on the website will go to a Florida jury 
		after closing arguments expected on Friday.
 | 
			
            | 
			 Six jurors will weigh a celebrity's right to privacy in the 
			Internet age against freedom of the press as protected under the 
			First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. 
 The former professional wrestler testified during a two-week civil 
			trial that he still suffers from the humiliation of the video's 
			release in 2012 by the New York-based website known for gossip and 
			media reporting.
 
 Hogan, who is suing in state court in St. Petersburg, Florida, near 
			his home, seeks $100 million in damages.
 
 The edited one-minute, 41-second video showed the longtime star of 
			World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) having sex with the wife of his 
			then-best friend, radio "shock jock" personality Bubba the Love 
			Sponge.
 
			   Hogan, 62, whose real name is Terry Bollea, said he did not know he 
			was being recorded when the consensual encounter was recorded about 
			a decade ago in a bedroom inside Bubba's home.
 Gawker said the post reflected the outlet's mission to cover true 
			and interesting subjects, stressing how Hogan made his sex life a 
			public matter through his many statements about it.
 
 Gawker excerpted a sex tape that it obtained without knowing its 
			exact origin. The editor involved said the post was intended as a 
			commentary on celebrity sex tapes, with the video clip focused on 
			bedside conversation and containing only nine seconds of sexual 
			activity.
 
            [to top of second column] | 
            
			 
			Neither side played the published video to the jury. It was entered 
			as court evidence, so jurors may view it during deliberations.
 Wearing a signature black bandana during his testimony, Hogan sought 
			to distinguish his real-life persona from the bombastic wrestling 
			character he said he portrayed with "artistic liberty." He said his 
			celebrity did not eliminate his right to privacy in a bedroom of a 
			trusted friend's home.
 
 The trial addressed topics ranging from celebrity nudity to 
			journalism ethics and website analytics.
 
 Gawker said it did not make money directly off the post, which it 
			flagged as unfit for workplace viewing and ran without display 
			advertisements. Experts for Hogan said the company netted 
			substantial gains from the traffic it generated.
 
 (Writing by Letitia Stein; Editing by Colleen Jenkins and Cynthia 
			Osterman)
 
			[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			 |