| 
			 
						A vegetarian world would 
						be healthier, cooler and richer: scientists 
			
   
            
			Send a link to a friend  
 
			
		[March 22, 2016] 
		 By Megan Rowling 
			
		BARCELONA (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - By 
		eating less meat and more fruit and vegetables, the world could avoid 
		several million deaths per year by 2050, cut planet-warming emissions 
		substantially, and save billions of dollars annually in healthcare costs 
		and climate damage, researchers said. 
             | 
        
        
            | 
             
			
			 A new study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of 
			Sciences of the United States of America, is the first to estimate 
			both the health and climate change impacts of a global move toward a 
			more plant-based diet, they said. 
			 
			Unbalanced diets are responsible for the greatest health burden 
			around the world, and our food system produces more than a quarter 
			of greenhouse gas emissions, said lead author Marco Springmann of 
			the Oxford Martin Programme on the Future of Food. 
			 
			“What we eat greatly influences our personal health and the global 
			environment,” he said. 
			 
			The Oxford University researchers modeled the effects of four 
			different diets by mid-century: a 'business as usual' scenario; one 
			that follows global guidelines including minimum amounts of fruits 
			and vegetables and limits on red meat, sugar and total calories; a 
			vegetarian diet; and a vegan diet. 
			 
			Adopting a diet in line with the global guidelines could avoid 5.1 
			million deaths per year by 2050, while 8.1 million fewer people 
			would die in a world of vegans who do not consume animal products, 
			including eggs and milk. 
			
			  
			When it comes to climate change, following dietary recommendations 
			would cut food-related emissions by 29 percent, adopting vegetarian 
			diets would cut them by 63 percent and vegan diets by 70 percent. 
			 
			Dietary shifts could produce savings of $700 billion to $1,000 
			billion per year on healthcare, unpaid care and lost working days, 
			while the economic benefit of reduced greenhouse gas emissions could 
			be as much as $570 billion, the study said. 
			 
			REGIONAL DIFFERENCES 
			 
			The researchers found that three-quarters of all benefits would 
			occur in developing countries, although the per capita impacts of 
			dietary change would be greatest in developed nations, due to higher 
			rates of meat consumption and obesity. 
			 
			The economic value of health improvements could be comparable with, 
			and possibly larger than, the value of the avoided damage from 
			climate change, they added. 
			 
			"The value of those benefits makes a strong case for increased 
			public and private spending on program aimed to achieve healthier 
			and more environmentally sustainable diets,” Springmann said. 
			
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
  
				
			The study looked at regional differences which could be used to 
			identify the most suitable interventions for food production and 
			consumption, Springmann said. 
			 
			For example, lower red meat consumption would have the biggest 
			effect in East Asia, the West and Latin America, while boosting 
			fruit and vegetable intake was found to be the largest factor in 
			cutting deaths in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. 
			Lower calorie intake, leading to fewer overweight people, would play 
			a key role in improving health in the Eastern Mediterranean, Latin 
			America and Western nations, the study said. 
			 
			But it will not be easy. To achieve a diet that sticks to common 
			guidelines would require a 25 percent increase in the number of 
			fruits and vegetables eaten globally, and a 56 percent cut in red 
			meat. 
			 
			Overall humans would need to consume 15 percent fewer calories, it 
			said. 
			 
			“We do not expect everybody to become vegan,” Springmann added. “But 
			climate change impacts of the food system will be hard to tackle and 
			likely require more than just technological changes. Adopting 
			healthier and more environmentally sustainable diets can be a large 
			step in the right direction." 
			 
			(This version of the story clarifies the figures in paragraph 1 to 
			show they are annual.) 
			 
			(Reporting by Megan Rowling, editing by Tim Pearce. Please credit 
			the Thomson Reuters Foundation, the charitable arm of Thomson 
			Reuters, that covers humanitarian news, women's rights, trafficking, 
			corruption and climate change. Visit http://news.trust.org) 
			[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			 
			   |