Missouri lawmakers pass bill to restrict
viewing of police camera footage
Send a link to a friend
[May 11, 2016]
By Eric M. Johnson
(Reuters) - Missouri lawmakers passed a
bill on Tuesday to restrict the public's access to police camera
footage, nearly two years after the slaying of a black teen in a St.
Louis suburb fueled demands across the country for more police
accountability.
|
Police body cameras are seen on a mannequin at an exhibit booth by
manufacturer Wolfcom at the International Association of Chiefs of
Police conference in Chicago, Illinois, October 26, 2015. REUTERS/Jim
Young |
The measure would block the public from accessing footage
collected by cameras worn by officers and mounted inside patrol
vehicles while investigations are ongoing.
Once an investigation is over, footage would remain restricted if
recorded at locations where "one would have a reasonable expectation
of privacy," such as inside schools, homes and medical facilities.
Governor Jay Nixon, a Democrat, was considering whether to sign the
proposal, an aide said.
The legislation was passed almost unanimously by the state's House
of Representatives on Tuesday after winning unanimous support in the
state Senate. Both chambers are Republican-led.
Police in Ferguson, Missouri, were not wearing body cameras in
August 2014 when a white patrolman fatally shot unarmed black
teenager Michael Brown. The incident sparked months of sometimes
violent protests and demands for police reforms, including mandatory
body cameras. Ferguson police use cameras now.
Many U.S. cities, including Los Angeles, Detroit and Seattle have
also moved toward supplying patrol officers with body cameras
following protests over what critics see as police use of
indiscriminate force against unarmed civilians, particularly racial
minorities and the mentally ill.
So far in 2016, Florida, Indiana, Utah and Washington state as well
as the District of Columbia have enacted laws governing the use of
body cameras, according to the National Conference of State
Legislatures. Twenty-three states have passed laws for body cameras,
the group said.
[to top of second column] |
Lawmakers and the Missouri Sheriff's Association that backed
restricted access to police videos cited privacy issues, such as
when officers rush into a home to help a victim of domestic
violence.
While the measure restricts access to footage gathered at schools,
homes and medical facilities, some people would be able to obtain
copies of the recordings, including those whose images or voices are
contained in the video, their attorneys or certain relatives, and
insurers.
The general public including journalists would have to seek a
court's permission to access videos taken from the designated
non-public places.
(Reporting by Eric M. Johnson in Seattle; Editing by Peter Cooney)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|