U.S. high court could spur Congress on
Puerto Rico debt crisis
Send a link to a friend
[May 12, 2016]
By Lawrence Hurley and Nick Brown
WASHINGTON/SAN JUAN (Reuters) - As the
U.S. Congress drags its feet on a bill to address Puerto Rico's $70
billion debt crisis, it could get kicked into high gear by an unlikely
source: the Supreme Court.
|
The Government Development Bank (GDB) is seen in San Juan, November 30,
2015. As the U.S. Congressdrags its feet on a bill to address Puerto
Rico's $70 billion debt crisis, it could get a kick in the pants from an
unlikelysource: the Supreme Court. Reuters/Alvin Baez/File Photo |
The highest U.S. court is due to rule by the end of June on the
validity of a Puerto Rico law that would allow the U.S. territory to
restructure the chunk of its debt issued by public agencies, more
than $20 billion, in a bankruptcy-like process.
The court fight is playing out as the Republican-led Congress
grapples with legislation that lawmakers hope will prevent the need
for a bailout of the territory of 3.5 million U.S. citizens.
The legislation is expected to put Puerto Rico's finances under
federal oversight through a control board and let the Caribbean
island cut debt through a bankruptcy-like restructuring process. It
would preempt the Recovery Act, the local restructuring law that was
thrown out in U.S. courts before Puerto Rico asked the Supreme Court
to reinstate it.
Puerto Rico is not covered by federal bankruptcy laws that U.S.
cities and public agencies can use, so some U.S. lawmakers view
legislation as the only way to keep the debt crisis from worsening.
But drafting the bill has been laborious. Some bondholders,
including U.S. hedge funds, and Republicans are seeking to ensure
that creditors get paid as much as possible of what they are owed.
Congressional Democrats, the Obama administration and Puerto Rico
itself are trying to prevent austerity that could threaten services
on the island.
An early draft of the bill by the House of Representatives Natural
Resources Committee never made it to a vote, and the panel on
Wednesday delayed unveiling the latest draft, citing the need for "a
number of refinements."
Some Republicans oppose inclusion of a "cram-down" provision that
would let Puerto Rico impose debt cuts on creditors who do not agree
to them.
LESS PALATABLE
A Supreme Court decision on Puerto Rico's law could come as soon as
Monday. The ruling could change the political dynamics for
Republicans by resurrecting a law that is viewed as even less
palatable to them than the congressional bill, according to
congressional sources and experts who follow the debate.
Many of the creditors lobbying conservatives in Congress to oppose
the legislation, known as the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management and
Economic Stability Act (PROMESA), would prefer to keep
debt-restructuring talks out of a bankruptcy court, or at least
avoid cram-down.
That is because in the normal course of business they are entitled
to full repayment, but in a bankruptcy proceeding they could be
legally made to accept discounts.
If the Supreme Court reinstates the Recovery Act, the congressional
legislation might not seem so bad to creditors in comparison, said
Melissa Jacoby, a University of North Carolina School of Law
bankruptcy expert and professor. "It might alter the lobbying
landscape," Jacoby said.
Puerto Rico has already defaulted on some of its debt, most recently
the bulk of a $422 million payment owed by its primary government
bank.
[to top of second column] |
The Recovery Act, if revived, would let the island restructure debt
at public utilities like power authority PREPA and water authority
PRASA, though the island's legislature could try to expand it to
cover other debts, Jacoby said.
The Supreme Court's March 22 oral arguments indicated the justices
could uphold the law.
Such a ruling could prompt creditors and Republican lawmakers to
embrace the need to pass the PROMESA bill. The legislation is
expected to carry more bondholder protections than the Recovery Act,
requiring an attempt at consensual restructuring talks as a
condition for any debt cuts.
"Those very same players who are now blocking our (congressional)
legislation will, all of a sudden, encourage the (Republican)
majority to pass some legislation" if the Supreme Court revives the
Recovery Act, said a Democratic House aide, speaking on condition of
anonymity.
The island's moment of truth could strike by June 30. That is the
date by which the Supreme Court is expected to rule and a day before
Puerto Rico faces a $1.9 billion debt payment that its governor has
said it cannot afford.
Congress is aiming to pass legislation to address Puerto Rico's
crisis before that payment.
Steny Hoyer, the second-ranking House Democrat, told Reuters the
high court’s ruling "could have some effect" on PROMESA's drafting
process "depending on what the Supreme Court says about Puerto Rican
authority to do whatever it needs to do."
A source close to major creditors said a ruling reinstating the
Recovery Act could encourage Congress to pass legislation for a
different reason: creditors would keep litigating different aspects
of that law, perpetuating Puerto Rico's economic uncertainty.
Parish Braden, a spokesman for House National Resources Committee
Republicans, said Congress ultimately must act regardless of what
the Supreme Court does.
"The ball is already in Congress' court," Braden said.
(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley in Washington and Nick Brown in San
Juan; Additional reporting by Richard Cowan in Waashington; Editing
by Will Dunham)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |